Does a Program Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Affect Kinesiophobia in Patients Following Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized, Controlled Trial With a 6-Month Follow-Up
Abstract
Background To evaluate the effects of a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program on kinesiophobia, knee function, pain and pain catastrophizing in patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods This was a parallel-group, randomized, controlled pilot study in which 100 patients who exhibited kinesiophobia after TKA were randomly assigned to participate in a CBT (experimental group) or standard care (control group) program. Each group included 50 patients. Before intervention (preintervention), 4 weeks after intervention (postintervention), and 6 months after the end of intervention (follow-up), patients were assessed via the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, a numerical rating scale, and the Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating scale. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test the significance of each outcome measure. Results The CBT program had significant group (P Conclusion The CBT program was superior to standard care in reducing kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, and knee pain and in enhancing knee function in patients who have a high level of kinesiophobia following TKA. The treatment effect was clinically significant and lasted for at least 6 months after the end of the intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Twelve studies evaluated (sub)acute outcomes, and all but two evaluated chronic outcomes.
“Twelve studies evaluated (sub)acute outcomes, 2,7,11,12,18,21,29,32,39,44,45,55 and all but 2 studies 2,18 evaluated chronic outcomes.”
Three individual studies showed large effect sizes for all or most of their outcomes.
“When looking at individual studies, 3 of them showed large effect sizes for all or most of their outcomes.7,10,32”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 127
- Authors
- Cai, L., Gao, H., Xu, H., Wang, Y., Lyu, P., & Liu, Y.
- Affiliations
- First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Yanjin
- Venue
- The Journal of Arthroplasty
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 704-710
- ISSN
- 0883-5403 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2766989544
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Arthroplasty (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, kinesiophobia, total knee arthroplasty, pain catastrophizing, knee pain, knee function, psychological intervention, postoperative rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, China, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Phobic Disorders, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Catastrophization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review