Cited by 65Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Impact of Component Alignment and Soft Tissue Release on 2-Year Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vigdorchik, Jonathan M., Wakelin, Edgar A., Koenig, Jan A., Ponder, Corey E., Plaskos, Christopher, DeClaire, Jeffrey H., Lawrence, Jeffrey M., Keggi, John M.·2022·The Journal of Arthroplasty

Abstract

Background The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of alignment and soft tissue release on patient outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods In a multicenter study, soft tissue releases during TKA were prospectively documented in 330 robotic-assisted TKAs. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were captured postoperatively. Delphi analysis was used to determine inlier and outlier component alignment boundaries: Tibia Coronal (TC): ±3°, Femur Coronal (FC): ±3°, Femoral Axial (FA): 3°Int-6°Ext, Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA): 3°Val-4°Var, and Tibiofemoral Axial (TFA): 3°Int-6°Ext. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance tests were used to compare groups. Results No significant differences were found between any individual or grouped inlier and outlier alignment criterion and KOOS at any timepoint. Outlier alignment frequencies were: TC: 0%, FC: 12%, FA: 8%, HKA: 9%, TFA: 8%, and Any: 23%. Soft tissue releases were performed in 18% of cases. Knees with soft tissue releases reported significantly worse KOOS scores at: 6M: Symptoms (80.0 versus 75.3, P = .03), activities of daily living (ADL) (86.2 versus 80.8, P = .030), quality of life (70.1 versus 60.9, P = .008), 12M ADL (90.0 versus 85.1, P = .023), and 24M ADL (91.9 versus 87.2, P = .016). A higher proportion of patients achieved Minimal Clinically Important Difference for pain at 6 months for those having no releases versus released (92.3% versus 81.0%, P = .021). No significant associatio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arth.2022.04.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vigdorchik, J. M., Wakelin, E. A., Koenig, J. A., Ponder, C. E., Plaskos, C., DeClaire, J. H., Lawrence, J. M., & Keggi, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • DeClaire LaMacchia Orthopaedic Institute (US)
  • Gundersen Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Vigdorchik, Jonathan M.
Venue
The Journal of Arthroplasty
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
37
Issue
10
Pages
2035-2040.e5
ISSN
0883-5403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229079220
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 2
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Arthroplasty (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, component alignment, soft tissue release, robotic surgery, KOOS, patient-reported outcomes, knee deformity, tibiofemoral alignment, femoral rotation, tibial rotation, minimal clinically important difference
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee Prosthesis, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Tibia, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review