Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion

Ruotolo, Charles, Fow, Jonathan E, Nottage, Wesley M·2004·Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: Management of articular sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears is controversial. Most management decisions rest on determining the thickness of tendon loss and location of tendon involvement, without any clear guidelines offered on how to make this determination. This study attempts to confirm the normal cuff thickness at its humeral head attachment and correlate the amount of exposed bone at the "footprint" attachment of the supraspinatus as an accurate measurement of the amount of tendon loss. TYPE OF STUDY: Anatomic study. METHODS: Forty-eight cadaver shoulders with an average age of 71.5 years were examined. Specimens with full- or partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were not measured, leaving 17 specimens with an average age of 70 for analysis. The anterior to posterior width of the supraspinatus was measured with a caliper, as well as the medial to lateral width at the rotator interval, at midtendon, and at the posterior limit determined by the spine of the scapula raphe. The distance from the articular cartilage margin to the supraspinatus tendon insertion was also measured. RESULTS: The mean anteroposterior dimension of the supraspinatus insertion was 25 mm. The mean superior to inferior tendon thickness at the rotator interval was 11.6 mm, 12.1 mm at midtendon, and 12 mm at the posterior edge. The distance from the articular cartilage margin to the bony tendon insertion was 1.5 to 1.9 mm, with a mean of 1.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Articular partial-thickness tears with > 7 mm of exposed bone lateral to the articular margin should be considered significant tears approximating 50% of the tendon substance. Arthroscopic measurement of the exposed bone between the articular margin and the supraspinatus tendon insertion (footprint) is an accurate way to estimate tear depth and provide a rational, reproducible guideline for treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Ruotolo, C., Fow, J. E., & Nottage, W. M.
Venue
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
246-249
ISSN
0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981505389
Cited by
191
References
1
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.002
The paper
Ruotolo, C., Fow, J. E., & Nottage, W. M. (2004). The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.