The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion
Abstract
PURPOSE: Management of articular sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears is controversial. Most management decisions rest on determining the thickness of tendon loss and location of tendon involvement, without any clear guidelines offered on how to make this determination. This study attempts to confirm the normal cuff thickness at its humeral head attachment and correlate the amount of exposed bone at the "footprint" attachment of the supraspinatus as an accurate measurement of the amount of tendon loss. TYPE OF STUDY: Anatomic study. METHODS: Forty-eight cadaver shoulders with an average age of 71.5 years were examined. Specimens with full- or partial-thickness rotator cuff tears were not measured, leaving 17 specimens with an average age of 70 for analysis. The anterior to posterior width of the supraspinatus was measured with a caliper, as well as the medial to lateral width at the rotator interval, at midtendon, and at the posterior limit determined by the spine of the scapula raphe. The distance from the articular cartilage margin to the supraspinatus tendon insertion was also measured. RESULTS: The mean anteroposterior dimension of the supraspinatus insertion was 25 mm. The mean superior to inferior tendon thickness at the rotator interval was 11.6 mm, 12.1 mm at midtendon, and 12 mm at the posterior edge. The distance from the articular cartilage margin to the bony tendon insertion was 1.5 to 1.9 mm, with a mean of 1.7 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Articular partial-thickness tears with > 7 mm of exposed bone lateral to the articular margin should be considered significant tears approximating 50% of the tendon substance. Arthroscopic measurement of the exposed bone between the articular margin and the supraspinatus tendon insertion (footprint) is an accurate way to estimate tear depth and provide a rational, reproducible guideline for treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnosis and Treatment of Incomplete Rotator Cuff Tears
ELLMAN, H. (1990) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199005000-00010 · Cited by 678
Cited by
The Insertional Footprint of the Rotator Cuff: An Anatomic Study
Curtis, A. S., Burbank, K. M., Tierney, J. J., Scheller, A. D., & Curran, A. R. (2006) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.001 · Cited by 316
Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Matava, M. J., Purcell, D. B., & Rudzki, J. R. (2005) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546505280213 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruotolo, C., Fow, J. E., & Nottage, W. M.
- Venue
- Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 246-249
- ISSN
- 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981505389
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.002
- The paper
- Ruotolo, C., Fow, J. E., & Nottage, W. M. (2004). The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of the supraspinatus insertion. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.