Generalized Joint Laxity and Contralateral Patellar Hypermobility in Unilateral Recurrent Patellar Dislocators
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the relation between generalized joint laxity and patellar hypermobility in unilateral recurrent patellar dislocators. Type of study Case series. Methods A total of 82 patients (23 male and 59 female patients) with unilateral recurrent patellar dislocation were studied compared with an age- and sex-matched control group. The modified Carter and Wilkinson criteria for generalized joint laxity and lateral patellar hypermobility test were examined. Results Generalized joint laxity (score of 4 or 5) was present in 20 patients (24%) with recurrent patellar dislocation in 8 subjects (10%) of the control group. The mean total score was 2.5 (SD, 1.4) in the recurrent patellar dislocators and 1.7 (SD, 1.3) in the control group. The incidence of generalized joint laxity (P = .013) and the mean total score (P = .00004) were statistically significant between the two groups. A hypermobile patella was present in 42 patients (51%) and in 5 subjects (6%) of the control group. There was a large statistically significant difference between the two groups (P Conclusions Although a hypermobile patella and generalized joint laxity were significant between the recurrent patellar dislocators and the control group, a hypermobile patella was more significant than generalized joint laxity as the predisposing factors of patellar dislocation. Level of evidence Level IV, prognostic case series.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients with recurrent patella instability had higher rates of GJH than controls (24% vs. 10% based on Carter Wilkinson ≥ 4).
“In the knee, Nomura et al. [24] found patients with recurrent patella instability had higher rates of GJH than controls (24% vs. 10% based on Carter Wilkinson ≥ 4).”
From Pediatric joint hypermobility: a diagnostic framework and narrative review (2023) · cites this paper as [24]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Nomura, E., Inoue, M., & Kobayashi, S.
- Affiliations
- Kawasaki Municipal Hospital (JP)
- Isehara Kyodo Hospital (JP)
- University of Fukui (JP)
- Venue
- Arthroscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 861-865
- ISSN
- 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-3231
- OpenAlex
- W1978448477
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
- Keywords
- recurrent patellar dislocation, generalized joint laxity, predisposing factors, knee instability
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Causality, Patellar Dislocation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review