Cited by 75Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesConnective tissue disorders researchFoot and Ankle Surgery

Generalized Joint Laxity and Contralateral Patellar Hypermobility in Unilateral Recurrent Patellar Dislocators

Nomura, Eiki, Inoue, Motoyasu, Kobayashi, Shigeryu·2006·Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess the relation between generalized joint laxity and patellar hypermobility in unilateral recurrent patellar dislocators. Type of study Case series. Methods A total of 82 patients (23 male and 59 female patients) with unilateral recurrent patellar dislocation were studied compared with an age- and sex-matched control group. The modified Carter and Wilkinson criteria for generalized joint laxity and lateral patellar hypermobility test were examined. Results Generalized joint laxity (score of 4 or 5) was present in 20 patients (24%) with recurrent patellar dislocation in 8 subjects (10%) of the control group. The mean total score was 2.5 (SD, 1.4) in the recurrent patellar dislocators and 1.7 (SD, 1.3) in the control group. The incidence of generalized joint laxity (P = .013) and the mean total score (P = .00004) were statistically significant between the two groups. A hypermobile patella was present in 42 patients (51%) and in 5 subjects (6%) of the control group. There was a large statistically significant difference between the two groups (P Conclusions Although a hypermobile patella and generalized joint laxity were significant between the recurrent patellar dislocators and the control group, a hypermobile patella was more significant than generalized joint laxity as the predisposing factors of patellar dislocation. Level of evidence Level IV, prognostic case series.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.090

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with recurrent patella instability had higher rates of GJH than controls (24% vs. 10% based on Carter Wilkinson ≥ 4).

    “In the knee, Nomura et al. [24] found patients with recurrent patella instability had higher rates of GJH than controls (24% vs. 10% based on Carter Wilkinson ≥ 4).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 75

Authors
Nomura, E., Inoue, M., & Kobayashi, S.
Affiliations
  • Kawasaki Municipal Hospital (JP)
  • Isehara Kyodo Hospital (JP)
  • University of Fukui (JP)
Venue
Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-08
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
861-865
ISSN
  • 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-3231
OpenAlex
W1978448477
Cited by
75
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Foot and Ankle Surgery
Keywords
recurrent patellar dislocation, generalized joint laxity, predisposing factors, knee instability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Causality, Patellar Dislocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review