Cited by 394Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Injectable Cultured Bone Marrow–Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Varus Knees With Cartilage Defects Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial With 2 Years' Follow‐up

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the results of the use of intra‐articular cultured autologous bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) injections in conjunction with microfracture and medial opening‐wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Methods: Fifty‐six knees in 56 patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritic knees and genu varum were randomly allocated to the cell‐recipient group (n = 28) or control group (n = 28). Patients who had a joint line congruity angle of more than 2°, malalignment of the knee from femoral causes, a fixed flexion deformity, or age older than 55 years were excluded. All patients underwent HTO and microfracture. The cell‐recipient group received intra‐articular injection of cultured MSCs with hyaluronic acid 3 weeks after surgery, whereas the control group only received hyaluronic acid. The primary outcome measure was the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at intervals of 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures were Tegner and Lysholm clinical scores and 1‐year postoperative Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) scores. Results: The median age of the patients was 51 years, with a mean body mass index of 23.85. Both treatment arms achieved improvements in Tegner, Lysholm, and IKDC scores. After adjustment for age, baseline scores, and time of evaluation, the cell‐recipient group showed significantly better scores. The effect of treatment showed an added improvement of 7.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04 to 12.26; P = .001) for IKDC scores, 7.61 (95% CI, 1.44 to 13.79; P = .016) for Lysholm scores, and 0.64 (95% CI, 0.10 to 1.19; P = .021) for Tegner scores. Magnetic resonance imaging scans performed 1 year after surgical intervention showed significantly better MOCART scores for the cell‐recipient group. The age‐adjusted mean difference in MOCART score was 19.6 (95% CI, 10.5 to 28.6; P < .001). Conclusions: Intra‐articular injection of cultured MSCs is effective in improving both short‐term clinical and MOCART outcomes in patients undergoing HTO and microfracture for varus knees with cartilage defects. Level of Evidence: Level II, randomized controlled trial.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.074

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.2106/00004623-199302000-00006 · DOI
  2. 10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22614 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90204-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0363546507308359 · DOI
  5. 10.2106/00004623-200509000-00002 · DOI
  6. 10.1053/joca.2001.0504 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.002 · DOI
  8. 10.2106/00004623-200300002-00008 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/00003086-200110001-00033 · DOI
  10. 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0169 · DOI
  11. 10.1182/blood.V78.1.55.55 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.03.014 · DOI
  13. Centeno C.J., 2008, Increased knee cartilage volume in degenerative joint disease using percutaneously implanted, autologous mesenchymal stem cells, Pain Physician, 11, 343
  14. 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0311 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0363546509359067 · DOI
  16. 10.1186/ar3735 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.011 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00167-006-0124-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/ar2460 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/0363546509360403 · DOI
  21. 10.1055/s-0030-1248031 · DOI
  22. 10.2106/JBJS.K.00815 · DOI
  23. 10.2106/JBJS.L.00319 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.017 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.009 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/jor.21267 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, K. L., Lee, K. B. L., Tai, B. C., Law, P., Lee, E. H., & Hui, J. H. P.
Affiliations
  • National University Health System (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-12
Volume
29
Issue
12
Pages
2020-2028
ISSN
  • 0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-3231
OpenAlex
W2088256967
Cited by
394
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 1
FWCI
27.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow-derived stem cells, intra-articular injection, genu varum, high tibial osteotomy, microfracture, cartilage defects, osteoarthritis, hyaluronic acid, cartilage repair, MOCART score, IKDC score, knee function outcomes, cell therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Bone Marrow Cells, Cartilage, Articular, Cells, Cultured, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyaluronic Acid, Injections, Intra-Articular, Male, Middle Aged, Osteotomy, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Arthroplasty, Subchondral, Young Adult, Genu Varum, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review