CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Ethics and Social Impacts of AIRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Fair navigation planning: A resource for characterizing and designing fairness in mobile robots

Open access
Brandão, Martim, Jirotka, Marina, Webb, Helena, Luff, Paul·2020·Artificial Intelligence
DOI 10.1016/j.artint.2020.103259
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artint.2020.103259

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optimizing a cumulative-cost approximation would lead to twice higher unfairness in this case.

    “In [3] we show that optimizing a cumulative-cost approximation would lead to twice higher unfairness in this case.”

    From Fair navigation planning: a humanitarian robot use case (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

  • The method used to generate these paths was based on evolutionary algorithms to compute Pareto-fronts, which do not offer optimality guarantees.

    “Themethod we used to generate these paths is not a traditional one in robotics: it was based on evolutionary algorithms to compute Pareto-fronts [3], which are algorithms that do not offer optimality guarantees.”

    From Fair navigation planning: a humanitarian robot use case (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brandão, M., Jirotka, M., Webb, H., & Luff, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Brandão, Martim
ORCID
Venue
Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
282
Pages
103259
ISSN
0004-3702 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.artint.2020.103259
OpenAlex
W3011939999
Cited by
35
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
fairness, autonomous systems, mobile robots, distributive justice, ethical design, rescue robots, indirect discrimination, equity-efficiency trade-off, privacy, responsible innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review