Cited by 103Surgical Simulation and TrainingSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareAnatomy and Medical Technology

Intelligent dental training simulator with objective skill assessment and feedback

Rhienmora, Phattanapon, Haddawy, Peter, Suebnukarn, Siriwan, Dailey, Matthew N.·2011·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Objective We present a dental training simulator that provides a virtual reality (VR) environment with haptic feedback for dental students to practice dental surgical skills in the context of a crown preparation procedure. The simulator addresses challenges in traditional training such as the subjective nature of surgical skill assessment and the limited availability of expert supervision. Methods and materials We identified important features for characterizing the quality of a procedure based on interviews with experienced dentists. The features are patterns combining tool position, tool orientation, and applied force. The simulator monitors these features during the procedure, objectively assesses the quality of the performed procedure using hidden Markov models (HMMs), and provides objective feedback on the user's performance in each stage of the procedure. We recruited five dental students and five experienced dentists to evaluate the accuracy of our skill assessment method and the quality of the system's generated feedback. Results The experimental results show that HMMs with selected features can correctly classify all test sequences into novice and expert categories. The evaluation also indicates a high acceptance rate from experts for the system's generated feedback. Conclusion In this work, we introduce our VR dental training simulator and describe a mechanism for providing objective skill assessment and feedback. The HMM is demonstrated as an effective tool for classifying a particular operator as novice-level or expert-level. The simulator can generate tutoring feedback with quality comparable to the feedback provided by human tutors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.04.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two of the works talk about AI-based assessment for the development of competences in the subject.

    “Thus, two of the works talk about this type of AI-based assessment for the development of competences in the subject [35,36]”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 103

Authors
Rhienmora, P., Haddawy, P., Suebnukarn, S., & Dailey, M. N.
Affiliations
  • Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
  • Thammasat University (TH)
Corresponding author
Rhienmora, Phattanapon
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
115-121
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049629312
Cited by
103
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
Keywords
virtual reality, haptic feedback, crown preparation, skill assessment, hidden Markov models, performance feedback, dental education
MeSH terms
Computer-Assisted Instruction, Computer Simulation, Education, Dental, Humans, Markov Chains, Students, Dental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review