Intelligent dental training simulator with objective skill assessment and feedback
Abstract
Objective We present a dental training simulator that provides a virtual reality (VR) environment with haptic feedback for dental students to practice dental surgical skills in the context of a crown preparation procedure. The simulator addresses challenges in traditional training such as the subjective nature of surgical skill assessment and the limited availability of expert supervision. Methods and materials We identified important features for characterizing the quality of a procedure based on interviews with experienced dentists. The features are patterns combining tool position, tool orientation, and applied force. The simulator monitors these features during the procedure, objectively assesses the quality of the performed procedure using hidden Markov models (HMMs), and provides objective feedback on the user's performance in each stage of the procedure. We recruited five dental students and five experienced dentists to evaluate the accuracy of our skill assessment method and the quality of the system's generated feedback. Results The experimental results show that HMMs with selected features can correctly classify all test sequences into novice and expert categories. The evaluation also indicates a high acceptance rate from experts for the system's generated feedback. Conclusion In this work, we introduce our VR dental training simulator and describe a mechanism for providing objective skill assessment and feedback. The HMM is demonstrated as an effective tool for classifying a particular operator as novice-level or expert-level. The simulator can generate tutoring feedback with quality comparable to the feedback provided by human tutors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two of the works talk about AI-based assessment for the development of competences in the subject.
“Thus, two of the works talk about this type of AI-based assessment for the development of competences in the subject [35,36]”
From Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [36]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Rhienmora, P., Haddawy, P., Suebnukarn, S., & Dailey, M. N.
- Affiliations
- Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
- Thammasat University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Rhienmora, Phattanapon
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-121
- ISSN
- 0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049629312
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Keywords
- virtual reality, haptic feedback, crown preparation, skill assessment, hidden Markov models, performance feedback, dental education
- MeSH terms
- Computer-Assisted Instruction, Computer Simulation, Education, Dental, Humans, Markov Chains, Students, Dental
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review