Predicting Patient Survival after Liver Transplantation Using Evolutionary Multi-Objective Artificial Neural Networks
Abstract
Objective The optimal allocation of organs in liver transplantation is a problem that can be resolved using machine-learning techniques. Classical methods of allocation included the assignment of an organ to the first patient on the waiting list without taking into account the characteristics of the donor and/or recipient. In this study, characteristics of the donor, recipient and transplant organ were used to determine graft survival. We utilised a dataset of liver transplants collected by eleven Spanish hospitals that provides data on the survival of patients three months after their operations.Methods and material To address the problem of organ allocation, the memetic Pareto evolutionary non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm 2 (MPENSGA2 algorithm), a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm, was used to train radial basis function neural networks, where accuracy was the measure used to evaluate model performance, along with the minimum sensitivity measurement. The neural network models obtained from the Pareto fronts were used to develop a rule-based system. This system will help medical experts allocate organs.Results The models obtained with the MPENSGA2 algorithm generally yielded competitive results for all performance metrics considered in this work, namely the correct classification rate (C), minimum sensitivity (MS), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), root mean squared error (RMSE) and Cohen's kappa (Kappa). In general, the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm demonstrated a better performance than the mono-objective algorithm, especially with regard to the MS extreme of the Pareto front, which yielded the best values of MS (48.98) and AUC (0.5659). The rule-based system efficiently complements the current allocation system (model for end-stage liver disease, MELD) based on the principles of efficiency and equity. This complementary effect occurred in 55% of the cases used in the simulation. The proposed rule-based system minimises the prediction probability error produced by two sets of models (one of them formed by models guided by one of the objectives (entropy) and the other composed of models guided by the other objective (MS)), such that it maximises the probability of success in liver transplants, with success based on graft survival three months post-transplant.Conclusion The proposed rule-based system is objective, because it does not involve medical experts (the expert's decision may be biased by several factors, such as his/her state of mind or familiarity with the patient). This system is a useful tool that aids medical experts in the allocation of organs; however, the final allocation decision must be made by an expert.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cruz-Ramirez et al. reported the use of AI artificial neural networks to improve donor-recipient pairing.
“In 2013, Cruz-Ramirez et al. reported the use of AI artificial neural networks (AI-ANNs) to improve donor-recipient pairing.”
From Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Cruz-Ramírez, M., Hervás-Martínez, C., Fernández, J. C., Briceño, J., & de la Mata, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Córdoba (ES)
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía (ES)
- Venue
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-49
- ISSN
- 0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068613509
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Regional Development Fund
- Junta de Andalucía (P08-TIC-3745)
- Ministério da Educação e Ciência (AP2009-0487)
- Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (TIN2011-22794)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
- Keywords
- liver transplantation, organ allocation, graft survival prediction, multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, Pareto front, radial basis function neural network, hybrid genetic algorithm, MELD score
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Graft Survival, Humans, Tissue and Organ Procurement, Prognosis, Waiting Lists, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Statistical, Liver Transplantation, Neural Networks, Computer, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review