Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning in generating radiology reports: A survey

Open access
Monshi, Maram Mahmoud A., Poon, Josiah, Chung, Vera·2020·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Highlights • Deep Learning algorithms showed promising results in generating radiology reports.• We categorize state of the art models into three levels: word, sentence and paragraph.• We review the publicly available datasets of radiology images and linked reports.• We compare results of the generated reports through quantitative evaluation matrices.• Researchers integrate convolutional neural network and recurrent neural network.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101878

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Monshi, M. M. A., Poon, J., & Chung, V.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
106
Pages
101878
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024545783
Cited by
192
References
33
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning in generating radiology reports: A survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101878
The paper
Monshi, M. M. A., Poon, J., & Chung, V. (2020). Deep learning in generating radiology reports: A survey. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101878

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.