CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Geotechnical and construction materials studiesGeotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The application of deep neural networks for the prediction of California Bearing Ratio of road subgrade soil

Open access
Othman, Kareem, Abdelwahab, Hassan·2023·Ain Shams Engineering Journal
DOI 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101988
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of the subgrade soil is one of the essential values for the design and construction of the asphalt pavement of highway projects. However, the estimation of the CBR value through laboratory tests is time-consuming and labor-intensive. Thus, this study focuses on providing artificial neural network (ANN) prediction models that can be efficiently used for the prediction of the CBR value of the subgrade soil in Egypt from the grain size distribution, Atterberg limits, and compaction parameters. 240 ANNs with different hyperparameters are investigated in order to optimize the hyperparameters so that the final chosen ANN can provide accurate results. The analysis shows that the deep neural networks outperform the shallow ANNs. Finally, comparing the performance of the ANNs with the traditional multiple linear regression (MLR) shows that ANNs outperform the MLR models as the ANNs have much better performance and can generate highly accurate predictions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asej.2022.101988

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Agarwal KB, Ghanekar KD. Prediction of CBR from plasticity characteristics of soil. In: Proceeding of 2nd south-east asian conference on soil engineering, 11–15 June 1970. Singapore; 1970. p. 571–6.
  2. Alam, 2020, Prediction of CBR value of fine grained soils of bengal basin by genetic expression programming, Artificial Neural Network and Krigging Method, J Geol Soc India, 95, 190, 10.1007/s12594-020-1409-0 · DOI
  3. Asteris, 2022, Revealing the nature of metakaolin-based concrete materials using artificial intelligence techniques, Constr Build Mater, 322, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126500 · DOI
  4. Asteris, 2022, Slope stability classification under seismic conditions using several tree-based intelligent techniques, Appl Sci, 12, 1753, 10.3390/app12031753 · DOI
  5. Asteris, 2021, Soft computing techniques for the prediction of concrete compressive strength using Non-Destructive tests, Constr Build Mater, 303, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124450 · DOI
  6. Yildirim, 2011, Estimation of California bearing ratio by using soft computing systems, Expert Syst Appl, 38, 6381, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.054 · DOI
  7. Yildrim, 2011, Estimation of CBR by soft computing systems, Expert Syst Appl, 38, 6381, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.054 · DOI
  8. Bardhan, 2021, Efficient computational techniques for predicting the California bearing ratio of soil in soaked conditions, Eng Geol, 291, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106239 · DOI
  9. Chegenizadeh, 2012, CBR test on fiber reinforced silty sand, Int J Struct Civ Eng, 1, 1
  10. Talukdar, 2014, A study of correlation between California bearing ratio (CBR) value with other properties of soil, Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng, 4, 559
  11. Abdella D, Abebe T, Quezon PE. Regression analysis of index properties of soil as strength determinant for California Bearing Ratio (CBR), GSJ (2017). Regression Analysis of Index Properties of Soil as Strength Determinant for California Bearing Ratio (CBR). GSJ 2017;5(6):1–12. Available from: https://www.scipedia.com/public/Abdella_et_al_2017b.
  12. Stephens, 1990, The prediction of the California bearing ratio, Civ Eng Siviele Ingenieurswese, 1990, 523
  13. Fikret Kurnaz, 2019, Prediction of the California bearing ratio (CBR) of compacted soils by using GMDH-type neural network, Eur Phys J Plus, 134, 326, 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12692-0 · DOI
  14. Bosurgi, 2005, A model based on artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms for pavement maintenance management, Int J Pavement Eng, 6, 201, 10.1080/10298430500195432 · DOI
  15. Gunaydin, 2010, Prediction of artificial soil’s unconfined compression strength test using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks, Adv Eng Software, 41, 1115, 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.06.008 · DOI
  16. Hassan, 2021, Prediction of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) using index soil properties and compaction parameters of low plastic fine-grained soil, Transp Infrastruct Geotech
  17. Haykin S. Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA; 1994.
  18. Ibrahim, 2017, Application of soft computing techniques and multiple regression models for CBR prediction of soils, J University Babylon, 25, 1552
  19. Jumikis AR. Geology of soils of the newark (NJ) metropolitan area. J Soil Mech 1958. · DOI
  20. Kardani, 2022, Predicting the thermal conductivity of soils using integrated approach of ANN and PSO with adaptive and time-varying acceleration coefficients, Int J Therm Sci, 173, 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2021.107427 · DOI
  21. Katte, 2019, Correlation of California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value with soil properties of road subgrade soil, Geotech Geol Eng, 37, 217, 10.1007/s10706-018-0604-x · DOI
  22. Lemonis, 2022, Ultimate axial load of rectangular concrete-filled steel tubes using multiple ANN activation functions, Steel Compos Struct, 42, 459
  23. Liu, 2008, Optimized approximation algorithm in neural networks without overfitting, IEEE Trans Neural Netw, 19, 983, 10.1109/TNN.2007.915114 · DOI
  24. Raja, 2021, An intelligent approach for predicting the strength of geosynthetic-reinforced subgrade soil, Int J Pavement Eng
  25. Mahmood M, Uthayasooriyan A, Mathavan S, Rahman M. A unified artificial neural network model for asphalt pavement condition prediction. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport. Thomas Telford Ltd; 2020. p. 1–11.
  26. Mei, 2004, Neural network for rapid depth evaluation of shallow cracks in asphalt pavements, Comput-Aided Civil Infrastruct Eng, 19, 223, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2004.00350.x · DOI
  27. Mousa, 2018, Models for estimating optimum asphalt content from aggregate gradation, Proc Inst Civ Eng-Constr Mater, 174, 69, 10.1680/jcoma.18.00035 · DOI
  28. Nagaraju TV, Gobinath R, Awoyera P, Abdy Sayyed MAH. Prediction of California bearing ratio of subgrade soils using artificial neural network principles. In: Sharma H, Gupta MK, Tomar GS, Lipo W, editors. Communication and Intelligent Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 204. Springer, Singapore; 2021. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-1089-9_12. · DOI
  29. Onyelowe, 2021, Application of 3-algorithm ANN programming to predict the strength performance of hydrated-lime activated rice husk ash treated soil, Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des, 4, 259, 10.1007/s41939-021-00093-7 · DOI
  30. Othman, 2021, Deep neural network models for the prediction of the aggregate base course compaction parameters, Designs, 5, 78, 10.3390/designs5040078 · DOI
  31. Othman, 2021, Prediction of the optimum asphalt content using artificial neural networks, Metall Mater Eng J Assoc Metall Eng Serbia AMES, 27, 227
  32. Othman K, Abdelwahab H. Prediction of the soil compaction parameters using deep neural networks. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 2021. · DOI
  33. Saklecha PP, et al. ANN modeling for strength characterization of subgrade soil in a basaltic terrain. In: Proc. ICAMB-2012; 2012. p. 1215–20.
  34. Piotrowski, 2013, A comparison of methods to avoid overfitting in neural networks training in the case of catchment runoff modelling, J Hydrol, 476, 97, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.019 · DOI
  35. Prechelt L. Neural networks: tricks of the trade; Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 1524. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany; 1998. p. 53–67.
  36. Rakaraddi, 2015, Establishing relationship between CBR with different soil properties, Int J Res Eng Technol, 4, 182, 10.15623/ijret.2015.0402023 · DOI
  37. Ring, 1962, Correlation of compaction and classification test data, Hwy Res Bull, 325, 55
  38. Al-Busultan, 2020, Application of artificial neural networks in predicting subbase CBR values using soil indices data, IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng, 671, 012106, 10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012106 · DOI
  39. Sujatha, 2019, Prediction of CBR from index properties of soil through ann modelling, J Emerg Technol Innova Res (JETIR), 6, 287
  40. Sabat, 2013, Prediction of California bearing ratio of a soil stabilized with lime and quarry dust using artificial neural network, Electron J Geotech Eng, 18, 3261
  41. Salahudeen AB, Sadeeq JA. California bearing ratio prediction of modified black clay using artificial neural networks In: Laryea S, Essah E, editors. Procs West Africa Built Environment Research (WABER) conference, 5-7 August 2019, Accra, Ghana; 2019. p. 268–281.
  42. Simpson PK. Artificial neural system: foundation, paradigms, applications and implementations. Influence of geological conditions on the powder factor for tunnel blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1990;41:533–8 (New York: Pergamon Press. 18. Yong-Hun, J., Chung-In, L.). · DOI
  43. Suthar, 2018, Predicting CBR value of stabilized pond ash with lime and lime sludge using ANN and MR models, Int J Geosynth Ground Eng, 4, 6, 10.1007/s40891-017-0125-3 · DOI
  44. Taskiran T. Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) of fine grained soils by AI methods. Adv Eng Softw 2010;41:886–92. doi: 10.016/j.advengsoft.2010.01.003. · DOI
  45. Taha, 2019, Regression and neural network models for California bearing ratio prediction of typical granular materials in Egypt, Arab J Sci Eng, 44, 8691, 10.1007/s13369-019-03803-z · DOI
  46. Tarahomi, 2020, ANNFAA: artificial neural network-based tool for the analysis of Federal Aviation Administration’s rigid pavement systems, Int J Pavement Eng, 1
  47. Trong, 2021, On random subspace optimization-based hybrid computing models predicting the California bearing ratio of soils, Materials, 14, 6516, 10.3390/ma14216516 · DOI
  48. Varol, 2021, Prediction of soil-bearing capacity on forest roads by statistical approaches, Environ Monit Assess, 193, 527, 10.1007/s10661-021-09335-0 · DOI
  49. Finnoff, 1993, Improving model selection by nonconvergent metho ds, Neural Networks, 6, 771, 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80122-4 · DOI
  50. Souza, 2020, Use of ANN and visual-manual classification for prediction of soil properties for paving purposes, Int J Pavement Eng
  51. Yang, 2002, The artificial neural network as a tool for assessing geotechnical properties, Geotech Geol Eng, 20, 149, 10.1023/A:1015066903985 · DOI
  52. Yildirim, 2011, Estimation of California bearing ratio by using soft computing systems, Expert Syst Appl, 38, 6381, 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.054 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Othman, K., & Abdelwahab, H.
Affiliations
Cairo University (EG)
Corresponding author
Othman, Kareem
ORCID
Othman, Kareem
Venue
Ain Shams Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
101988
ISSN
2090-4479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.asej.2022.101988
OpenAlex
W4298325774
Cited by
42
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Ain Shams Engineering Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Keywords
California bearing ratio, subgrade soil, deep neural network, artificial neural networks, flexible pavement design, grain size distribution, Atterberg limits, compaction parameters, hyperparameter optimization, multiple linear regression comparison, Egyptian soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review