Fuzzy FMEA application to improve purchasing process in a public hospital
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Traditional RPN calculation does not account for indirect relationships between components.
“Third, the traditional RPN calculation does not account for indirect relationships between components (Kumru et al., 2013).”
From Enhancing Pharma Manufacturing Efficiency: Integrating Lean Six Sigma and Fuzzy FMEA for Waste Reduction (2024) · cites this paper as Kumru et al., 2013
Traditional FMEA assumes that severity, occurrence, and detection have equal importance, which can introduce bias since there is no relative weighting among them.
“First, it assumes that the three factors -severity, occurrence, and detection -have equal importance, which can introduce bias since there is no relative weighting among them.”
From Enhancing Pharma Manufacturing Efficiency: Integrating Lean Six Sigma and Fuzzy FMEA for Waste Reduction (2024) · cites this paper as Kumru et al., 2013
Different activities can yield the same RPN even though their risk implications may differ.
“Second, different activities can yield the same RPN, even though their risk implications may differ”
From Enhancing Pharma Manufacturing Efficiency: Integrating Lean Six Sigma and Fuzzy FMEA for Waste Reduction (2024) · cites this paper as Kumru et al., 2013
Cites
Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean
Wang, Y.-M., Chin, K.-S., Poon, G. K. K., & Yang, J.-B. (2009) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.028 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kusumawardani, R., & Widyatmoko, A. A. (2024) · Spektrum Industri · doi:10.12928/si.v22i2.199 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Third, the traditional RPN calculation does not account for indirect relationships between components ( Kumru et al., 2013) .”
- Authors
- Kumru, M., & Kumru, P. Y.
- Affiliations
- Doğuş University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Kumru, Mesut
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 721-733
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007173178
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
- Kocaeli Üniversitesi - AVESİS (submittedVersion)
- Dogus University Institutional Repository (Dogus University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management Systems and Quality Improvement
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Keywords
- fuzzy FMEA, failure mode and effects analysis, risk priority number, fuzzy logic, procurement process, hospital purchasing, public hospitals, quality management, risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
