The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparative review of approaches to prevent premature convergence in GA
Abstract
Detailed discussion on various approaches for handling premature convergence in GA.Theoretical framework is presented for convergence analysis of GA.Strengths and weaknesses of each approach are provided.Summary and comparison of the approaches is given for quick review. This paper surveys strategies applied to avoid premature convergence in Genetic Algorithms (GAs). Genetic Algorithm belongs to the set of nature inspired algorithms. The applications of GA cover wide domains such as optimization, pattern recognition, learning, scheduling, economics, bioinformatics, etc. Fitness function is the measure of GA, distributed randomly in the population. Typically, the particular value for each gene start dominating as the search evolves. During the evolutionary search, fitness decreases as the population converges, this leads to the problems of the premature convergence and slow finishing. In this paper, a detailed and comprehensive survey of different approaches implemented to prevent premature convergence with their strengths and weaknesses is presented. This paper also discusses the details about GA, factors affecting the performance during the search for global optima and brief details about the theoretical framework of Genetic algorithm. The surveyed research is organized in a systematic order. A detailed summary and analysis of reviewed literature are given for the quick review. A comparison of reviewed literature has been made based on different parameters. The underlying motivation for this paper is to identify methods that allow the development of new strategies to prevent premature convergence and the effective utilization of genetic algorithms in the different area of research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.996017 · Cited by 50,053
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Punctuated equilibrium comes of age
Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366223a0 · Cited by 957
Cited by
Signatures of early frailty in the gut microbiota
Jackson, M. A., Jeffery, I. B., Beaumont, M., Bell, J. T., Clark, A. G., Ley, R. E., O’Toole, P. W., Spector, T. D., & Steves, C. J. (2016) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0262-7 · Cited by 436
Comparative review of selection techniques in genetic algorithm
Shukla, A., Pandey, H. M., & Mehrotra, D. (2015) · 2015 International Conference on Futuristic Trends on Computational Analysis and Knowledge Management (ABLAZE) · doi:10.1109/ablaze.2015.7154916 · Cited by 259
Self-citationTeoh, Y. K., Gill, S. S., & Parlikad, A. K. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3050441 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Pandey, H. M., Chaudhary, A., & Mehrotra, D.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 24
- Pages
- 1047-1077
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099585388
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparative review of approaches to prevent premature convergence in GA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.025
- The paper
- Pandey, H. M., Chaudhary, A., & Mehrotra, D. (2014). A comparative review of approaches to prevent premature convergence in GA. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.