Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 73Image Enhancement TechniquesMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modified differential evolution algorithm for contrast and brightness enhancement of satellite images

Suresh, Shilpa, Lal, Shyam·2017·Applied Soft Computing
DOI 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Hashemi, 2010, An image contrast enhancement method based on genetic algorithm, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 31, 1816, 10.1016/j.patrec.2009.12.006 · DOI
  2. Kim, 1997, Contrast enhancement using brightness preserving bi-histogram equalization, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 43, 1, 10.1109/TCE.2002.1010085 · DOI
  3. Wang, 1999, Image enhancement based on equal area dualistic sub-image histogram equalization method, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 45, 68, 10.1109/30.754419 · DOI
  4. Chen, 2003, Contrast enhancement using recursive mean-separate histogram equalization for scalable brightness preservation, IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., 49, 1301, 10.1109/TCE.2003.1261233 · DOI
  5. Lee, 2013, Contrast enhancement based on layered difference representation of 2D histograms, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 22, 5372, 10.1109/TIP.2013.2284059 · DOI
  6. Pal, 1994, Genetic algorithms for optimal image enhancement, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 15, 261, 10.1016/0167-8655(94)90058-2 · DOI
  7. dos Santos Coelho, 2009, Differential evolution optimization combined with chaotic sequences for image contrast enhancement, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 42, 522, 10.1016/j.chaos.2009.01.012 · DOI
  8. Kwok, 2009, Contrast enhancement and intensity preservation for gray-level images using multiobjective particle swarm optimization, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 6, 145, 10.1109/TASE.2008.917053 · DOI
  9. Shanmugavadivu, 2014, Particle swarm optimized multi-objective histogram equalization for image enhancement, Opt. Laser Technol., 57, 243, 10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.07.013 · DOI
  10. Ye, 2015, An adaptive image enhancement technique by combining cuckoo search and particle swarm optimization algorithm, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., 2015, 13, 10.1155/2015/825398 · DOI
  11. Bhandari, 2015, A new beta differential evolution algorithm for edge preserved colored satellite image enhancement, Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process., 1
  12. Hoseini, 2013, Efficient contrast enhancement of images using hybrid ant colony optimisation genetic algorithm and simulated annealing, Digit. Signal Process., 23, 879, 10.1016/j.dsp.2012.12.011 · DOI
  13. Gogna, 2013, Metaheuristics: review and application, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell., 25, 503, 10.1080/0952813X.2013.782347 · DOI
  14. Mahapatra, 2015, A hybrid particle swarm optimization and artificial immune system algorithm for image enhancement, Soft Comput., 19, 2101, 10.1007/s00500-014-1394-6 · DOI
  15. Bhandari, 2014, Cuckoo search algorithm based satellite image contrast and brightness enhancement using DWT-SVD, ISA Trans., 53, 1286, 10.1016/j.isatra.2014.04.007 · DOI
  16. Pizer, 1987, Adaptive histogram equalization and its variations, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process., 39, 355, 10.1016/S0734-189X(87)80186-X · DOI
  17. Stark, 2000, Adaptive image contrast enhancement using generalizations of histogram equalization, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 9, 889, 10.1109/83.841534 · DOI
  18. Gupta, 2014, Review of different local and global contrast enhancement techniques for a digital image, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 100, 18
  19. Zhou, 2008, Research of image enhancement based on particle swarm optimization, Microelectron. Comput., 25, 42
  20. Jain, 1995, vol. 5
  21. Canny, 1986, A computational approach to edge detection, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 6, 679, 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Storn, 1997, Differential evolution-a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, J. Glob. Optim., 11, 341, 10.1023/A:1008202821328 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Zaharie, 2009, Influence of crossover on the behavior of differential evolution algorithms, Appl. Soft Comput., 9, 1126, 10.1016/j.asoc.2009.02.012 · DOI
  24. Jeyakumar, 2011, Convergence Analysis of Differential Evolution Variants on Unconstrained Global Optimization Functions, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Appl., 2, 116
  25. Humphries, 2010, Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators, Nature, 465, 1066, 10.1038/nature09116 · DOI
  26. Suresh, 2016, An efficient cuckoo search algorithm based multilevel thresholding for segmentation of satellite images using different objective functions, Expert Syst. Appl., 58, 184, 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.032 · DOI
  27. Demirel, 2010, Satellite image contrast enhancement using discrete wavelet transform and singular value decomposition, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 7, 333, 10.1109/LGRS.2009.2034873 · DOI
  28. Fu, 2015, Remote sensing image enhancement using regularized-histogram equalization and DCT, IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 12, 2301, 10.1109/LGRS.2015.2473164 · DOI
  29. Lisani, 2016, An inquiry on contrast enhancement methods for satellite images, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 54, 7044, 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2594339 · DOI
  30. Moore, 1991, A real-time neural system for color constancy, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 2, 237, 10.1109/72.80334 · DOI
  31. Mai, 2011, Optimizing a tone curve for backward-compatible high dynamic range image and video compression, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 20, 1558, 10.1109/TIP.2010.2095866 · DOI
  32. Guo, 2016, LIME: A Method for Low-light IMage Enhancement, In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference 2016, 87, 10.1145/2964284.2967188 · DOI
  33. Zhan, 2017, Linking synaptic computation for image enhancement, Neurocomputing, 238, 1, 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.031 · DOI
  34. Gogna, 2012, Comparison of hybrid and classical metaheuristic for automatic image enhancement, Int. J. Comput. Appl., 0975
  35. Huynh-Thu, 2008, Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment, Electron. Lett., 44, 800, 10.1049/el:20080522 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Wang, 2002, A universal image quality index, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 9, 81, 10.1109/97.995823 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zhang, 2011, FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 20, 2378, 10.1109/TIP.2011.2109730 · DOI
  38. Bhandari, 2016, Dark satellite image enhancement using knee transfer function and gamma correction based on DWT-SVD, Multidimens. Syst. Signal Process., 27, 453, 10.1007/s11045-014-0310-7 · DOI
  39. Loizou, 2006, Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 44, 414, 10.1007/s11517-006-0045-1 · DOI
  40. Bae, 2016, A novel image quality assessment with globally and locally consilient visual quality perception, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 25, 2392, 10.1109/TIP.2016.2545863 · DOI
  41. Bae, 2013, A novel DCT-based JND model for luminance adaptation effect in DCT frequency, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 20, 893, 10.1109/LSP.2013.2272193 · DOI
  42. Shannon, 1948, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, 623, 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · DOI
  43. Fang, 2015, No-reference quality assessment of contrast-distorted images based on natural scene statistics, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 22, 838

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Suresh, S., & Lal, S.
Affiliations
National Institute of Technology Karnataka (IN)
Corresponding author
Lal, Shyam
ORCID
Venue
Applied Soft Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
61
Pages
622-641
ISSN
1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.019
OpenAlex
W2750002240
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Applied Soft Computing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Keywords
satellite image enhancement, contrast stretching, brightness enhancement, modified differential evolution, cuckoo search algorithm, hybrid metaheuristic, edge preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review