The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance
Abstract
Abstract Data normalization is one of the pre-processing approaches where the data is either scaled or transformed to make an equal contribution of each feature. The success of machine learning algorithms depends upon the quality of the data to obtain a generalized predictive model of the classification problem. The importance of data normalization for improving data quality and subsequently the performance of machine learning algorithms has been presented in many studies. But, the work lacks for the feature selection and feature weighting approaches, a current research trend in machine learning for improving performance. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of fourteen data normalization methods on classification performance considering full feature set, feature selection, and feature weighting. In this paper, we also present a modified Ant Lion optimization that search feature subsets and the best feature weights along with the parameter of Nearest Neighbor Classifier. Experiments are performed on 21 publicly available real and synthetic datasets, and results are analyzed based on the accuracy, the percentage of feature reduced and runtime. It has been observed from the results that no single method outperforms others. Therefore, we have suggested a set of the best and the worst methods combining the normalization procedure and empirical analysis of results. The better performers are z -Score and Pareto Scaling for the full feature set and feature selection, and tanh and its variant for feature weighting. The worst performers are Mean Centered, Variable Stability Scaling and Median and Median Absolute Deviation methods along with un-normalized data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,155
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition
(1990) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-27872-x · Cited by 11,031
Peng, H., Long, F., & Ding, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.159 · Cited by 10,544
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference
(2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.001.0001 · Cited by 8,890
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 7,715
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003) · Cited by 6,576
A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication
Hsu, C., Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C. (2008) · Cited by 5,046
Cited by
The choice of scaling technique matters for classification performance
de Amorim, L. B. V., Cavalcanti, G. D. C., & Cruz, R. M. O. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109924 · Cited by 382
Zheng, S., Pan, K., Liu, J., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.110382 · Cited by 127
Xie, J., Sun, L., & Zhao, Y. F. (2025) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2024.04.024 · Cited by 112
Stacked Intelligent Metasurfaces for Task-Oriented Semantic Communications
Huang, G., An, J., Yang, Z., Gan, L., Bennis, M., & Debbah, M. (2025) · IEEE Wireless Communications Letters · doi:10.1109/lwc.2024.3499970 · Cited by 39
SXAD: Shapely eXplainable AI-Based Anomaly Detection Using Log Data
Alam, K., Kifayat, K., Sampedro, G. A., Karovič, V., & Naeem, T. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3425472 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, D., & Singh, B.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 105524
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945020349
- Cited by
- 1,726
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 37.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524
- The paper
- Singh, D., & Singh, B. (2020). Investigating the impact of data normalization on classification performance. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105524
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.