The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new hybrid model for wind speed forecasting combining long short-term memory neural network, decomposition methods and grey wolf optimizer
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Reliable and accurate wind speed forecasting (WSF) is fundamental for efficient exploitation of wind power. In particular, high accuracy short-term WSF (ST-WSF) has a significant impact on the efficiency of wind power generation systems. Due to the non-stationarity and stochasticity of the wind speed (WS), a single model is often not sufficient in practice for the accurate estimation of the WS. Hybrid models are being proposed to overcome the limitations of single models and increase the WS forecasting performance. In this paper, a new hybrid WSF model is developed based on long short-term memory (LSTM) network and decomposition methods with grey wolf optimizer (GWO). In the pre-processing stage, the missing data is filled by the weighted moving average (WMA) method, the WS time series (WSTS) data are smoothed by WMA filtering and the smoothed data are used as model input after Z -score normalization. The forecasting model is formed by the combination of a single model, a decomposition method and an advanced optimization algorithm. Successively, the hybrid WSF model is developed by combining the LSTM and decomposition methods, and optimizing the intrinsic mode function (IMF) estimated outputs with a grey wolf optimizer (GWO). The developed non-linear hybrid model is utilized on the data collected from five wind farms in the Marmara region, Turkey. The obtained experimental results indicate that the proposed combined model can capture non-linear characteristics of WSTS, achieving better forecasting performance than single forecasting models, in terms of accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Cited by
A review of wind speed and wind power forecasting with deep neural networks
Wang, Y., Zou, R., Liu, F., Zhang, L., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117766 · Cited by 959
Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios
Chai, J., Zeng, H., Li, A., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2021) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100134 · Cited by 754
Zhao, Z., Yun, S., Jia, L., Guo, J., Meng, Y., He, N., Li, X., Shi, J., & Yang, L. (2023) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.105982 · Cited by 389
Kaveh, M., & Mesgari, M. S. (2023) · Neural Processing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11063-022-11055-6 · Cited by 292
Lipu, M. S. H., Miah, M. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Sarker, M. R., Ayob, A., Saad, M. H. M., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3097102 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Altan, A., Karasu, S., & Zio, E.
- Venue
- Applied Soft Computing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 106996
- ISSN
- 1568-4946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3112756409
- Cited by
- 597
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new hybrid model for wind speed forecasting combining long short-term memory neural network, decomposition methods and grey wolf optimizer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106996
- The paper
- Altan, A., Karasu, S., & Zio, E. (2021). A new hybrid model for wind speed forecasting combining long short-term memory neural network, decomposition methods and grey wolf optimizer. Applied Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.