Cited by 55Effects of Radiation ExposureSpaceflight effects on biologyRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry

Heavy particle irradiation, neurochemistry and behavior: Thresholds, dose-response curves and recovery of function

Rabin, B.M., Joseph, J.A., Shukitt-Hale, B.·2004·Advances in Space Research

Abstract

Exposure to heavy particles can affect the functioning of the central nervous system (CNS), particularly the dopaminergic system. In turn, the radiation-induced disruption of dopaminergic function affects a variety of behaviors that are dependent upon the integrity of this system, including motor behavior (upper body strength), amphetamine (dopamine)-mediated taste aversion learning, and operant conditioning (fixed-ratio bar pressing). Although the relationships between heavy particle irradiation and the effects of exposure depend, to some extent, upon the specific behavioral or neurochemical endpoint under consideration, a review of the available research leads to the hypothesis that the endpoints mediated by the CNS have certain characteristics in common. These include: (1) a threshold, below which there is no apparent effect; (2) the lack of a dose-response relationship, or an extremely steep dose-response curve, depending on the particular endpoint; and (3) the absence of recovery of function, such that the heavy particle-induced behavioral and neural changes are present when tested up to one year following exposure. The current report reviews the data relevant to the degree to which these characteristics are common to neurochemical and behavioral endpoints that are mediated by the effects of exposure to heavy particles on CNS activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asr.2003.09.051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies modelling the impact of HZE particles on cognitive performance cannot be generalized from radiobiology studies of chromosomal aberrations and carcinogenesis.

    “Understanding the mechanisms is complicated, as Rabin et al. have shown that studies modelling the impact of HZE particles on cognitive performance cannot be generalized from radiobiology studies of chromosomal aberrations and carcinogenesis [57].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 55

Authors
Rabin, B. M., Joseph, J. A., & Shukitt-Hale, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Rabin, B.M.
Venue
Advances in Space Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004
Volume
33
Issue
8
Pages
1330-1333
ISSN
0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067732480
Cited by
55
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Keywords
heavy particle irradiation, space radiation, central nervous system, dopaminergic system, dose-response relationship, radiation threshold, functional recovery, motor behavior, conditioned taste aversion, operant conditioning
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Central Nervous System, Conditioning, Psychological, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Motor Activity, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Neurochemistry, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Taste, Recovery of Function, Heavy Ions, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review