Heavy particle irradiation, neurochemistry and behavior: Thresholds, dose-response curves and recovery of function
Abstract
Exposure to heavy particles can affect the functioning of the central nervous system (CNS), particularly the dopaminergic system. In turn, the radiation-induced disruption of dopaminergic function affects a variety of behaviors that are dependent upon the integrity of this system, including motor behavior (upper body strength), amphetamine (dopamine)-mediated taste aversion learning, and operant conditioning (fixed-ratio bar pressing). Although the relationships between heavy particle irradiation and the effects of exposure depend, to some extent, upon the specific behavioral or neurochemical endpoint under consideration, a review of the available research leads to the hypothesis that the endpoints mediated by the CNS have certain characteristics in common. These include: (1) a threshold, below which there is no apparent effect; (2) the lack of a dose-response relationship, or an extremely steep dose-response curve, depending on the particular endpoint; and (3) the absence of recovery of function, such that the heavy particle-induced behavioral and neural changes are present when tested up to one year following exposure. The current report reviews the data relevant to the degree to which these characteristics are common to neurochemical and behavioral endpoints that are mediated by the effects of exposure to heavy particles on CNS activity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies modelling the impact of HZE particles on cognitive performance cannot be generalized from radiobiology studies of chromosomal aberrations and carcinogenesis.
“Understanding the mechanisms is complicated, as Rabin et al. have shown that studies modelling the impact of HZE particles on cognitive performance cannot be generalized from radiobiology studies of chromosomal aberrations and carcinogenesis [57].”
From Space Radiation: The number one risk to astronaut health beyond low earth orbit (2014) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Rabin, B. M., Joseph, J. A., & Shukitt-Hale, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- Tufts University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rabin, B.M.
- Venue
- Advances in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1330-1333
- ISSN
- 0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067732480
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Keywords
- heavy particle irradiation, space radiation, central nervous system, dopaminergic system, dose-response relationship, radiation threshold, functional recovery, motor behavior, conditioned taste aversion, operant conditioning
- MeSH terms
- Amphetamine, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Central Nervous System, Conditioning, Psychological, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Motor Activity, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Neurochemistry, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Taste, Recovery of Function, Heavy Ions, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review