The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
A multilayer perceptron hazard detector for vision-based autonomous planetary landing
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some machine learning classifiers for image-based hazard detection, such as perceptrons, generally require the manual input of relevant features of the surface.
“For image-based hazard detection in particular, some machine learning classifiers, such as perceptrons [15], have been explored. Still, these approaches generally require the manual input of relevant features of the surface.”
From Image-Based Lunar Hazard Detection in Low Illumination Simulated Conditions via Vision Transformers (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Açikmeşe, 2007, Convex programming approach to powered descent guidance for Mars landing, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 30, 1353, 10.2514/1.27553 · DOI
- Amzajerdian, F., Pierrottet, D.F., Hines, G.D., Petway, L.B., Barnes, B.W., 2013. Doppler lidar sensor for precision navigation in GPS-deprived environment. In: Proc. SPIE 8731, 87310G-87310G-6. · DOI
- Arvidson, 2008, Mars exploration program 2007 phoenix landing site selection and characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.: Planets, 113
- Betts, 1998, Survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 21, 193, 10.2514/2.4231 · DOI
- Blackmore, 2010, Minimum-landing-error powered-descent guidance for Mars landing using convex optimization, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 33, 1161, 10.2514/1.47202 · DOI
- Cross, 1968, The computer simulation of lunar craters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 139, 261, 10.1093/mnras/139.2.261 · DOI
- Daugman, 1988, Complete discrete 2-D Gabor transforms by neural networks for image analysis and compression, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 36, 1169, 10.1109/29.1644 · DOI
- Dunstan, M., Hornbostel, K., 2014. Image processing chip for relative navigation for lunar landing. In: 9th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation, and Control Systems, Porto, Portugal.
- Fahlman, 1990, The cascade-correlation learning architecture, vol. 2, 524
- Fahroo, 2002, Direct trajectory optimization by a Chebyshev pseudospectral method, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 25, 160, 10.2514/2.4862 · DOI
- Furfaro, 2012, Autonomous real-time landing site selection for venus and titan using evolutionary fuzzy cognitive maps, Appl. Soft Comput., 12, 3825, 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.01.014 · DOI
- Golombek, 2012, Selection of the Mars science laboratory landing site, Space Sci. Rev., 170, 641, 10.1007/s11214-012-9916-y · DOI
- Hornik, 1991, Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks, Neural Networks, 4, 251, 10.1016/0893-6080(91)90009-T · DOI · Paper page
- Hornik, 1990, Universal approximation of an unknown mapping and its derivatives using multilayer feedforward networks, Neural Networks, 3, 551, 10.1016/0893-6080(90)90005-6 · DOI
- Kekre, 2010, Image segmentation using extended edge operator for mammographic images, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., 2, 1086
- Klumpp, 1974, Apollo lunar descent guidance, Automatica, 10, 133, 10.1016/0005-1098(74)90019-3 · DOI
- Leshno, 1993, Multilayer feedforward networks with a nonpolynomial activation function can approximate any function, Neural Networks, 6, 861, 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80131-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Lunghi, 2015, A semi-analytical guidance algorithm for autonomous landing, Adv. Space Res., 55, 2719, 10.1016/j.asr.2015.02.022 · DOI · Paper page
- Masursky, 1976, The viking landing sites: selection and certification, Science, 193, 809, 10.1126/science.193.4255.809 · DOI
- Matthies, L., Huertas, A., Cheng, Y., Johnson, A., 2007. Landing hazard detection with stereo vision and shadow analysis. In: AIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference, Rohnert Park, CA, AIAA Paper 2007–2835. · DOI
- Parreira, B., Di Sotto, E., Caramagno, A., Rebordão, J., 2008. Hazard avoidance for planetary landing: GNC design and performance assessment. In: 7th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control Systems, Tralee, Ireland.
- Parreira, B., Rogata, P., Di Sotto, E., Caramagno, A., Rebordao, J.M., Motrena, P., Mancuso, S., 2007. Consolidated performance assessment of hazard avoidance techniques for vision based landing. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Hilton Head, SC, AIAA Paper 2007–6854. · DOI
- Pien, H., 1991. Autonomous hazard detection and avoidance for Mars exploration. In: 8th AIAA Computing in Aerospace Conference, Baltimora, MD, AIAA Paper 1991–3731. · DOI
- Riedel, J., Vaughan, A., Werner, R.A., Tseng-Chan, W., Nolet, S., Myers, D., Mastrodemos, N., Lee, A., Grasso, C., Ely, T., Bayard, D., 2010. Optical navigation plan and strategy for the lunar lander Altair; OpNav for lunar and other crewed and robotic exploration applications. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, AIAA Paper 2010–7719. · DOI
- Saxena, 2006, Learning depth from single monocular images, vol. 18, 1161
- Schölkopf, 1998, Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem, Neural Comput., 10, 1299, 10.1162/089976698300017467 · DOI
- Shankar, U.J., S., W.-J., Criss, T.B., Adams, D., 2008. Lunar terrain surface modeling for the ALHAT program. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, pp. 1–10. · DOI
- Spencer, 2009, Phoenix landing site hazard assessment and selection, J. Spacecr. Rockets, 46, 1196, 10.2514/1.43932 · DOI
- Trawny, N., Carson, J.M., Huertas, A., Luna, M.E., Robak, V.E., Johnson, A.E., Martin, K.E., Villalpando, C.Y., 2013. Helicopter flight testing of a real-time hazard detection system for safe lunar landing. In: AIAA SPACE Conference and Exposition, San Diego, CA, AIAA Paper 2013–5313. · DOI
- Ulamec, 2015, Rosetta lander – Philae: landing preparations, Acta Astronaut., 107, 79, 10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.11.019 · DOI
- Wibben, 2016, Optimal sliding guidance algorithm for Mars powered descent phase, Adv. Space Res., 57, 948, 10.1016/j.asr.2015.12.006 · DOI
- Woicke, S., Mooij, E., 2014. Stereo-vision algorithm for hazard detection during planetary landings. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, National Harbour, MD, AIAA Paper 2014–0272. · DOI
- Wong, E., Masciarelli, J., Singh, G., 2002. Autonomous guidance and control design for hazard avoidance and safe landing on Mars. In: AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Monterey, CA, AIAA Paper 2002–4619. · DOI
- Yonaba, 2010, Comparing sigmoid transfer functions for neural network multistep ahead streamflow forecasting, J. Hydrol. Eng., 15, 275, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000188 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lunghi, P., Ciarambino, M., & Lavagna, M.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Lunghi, Paolo
- Venue
- Advances in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-144
- ISSN
- 0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2337643215
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Keywords
- threat detection, planetary landing, multilayer perceptron, artificial neural networks, target selection, hazard maps, vision-based guidance, lunar landing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review