Technical evaluation of additive manufacturing technologies for in-situ fabrication with lunar regolith
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Isachenkov et al. determined that SLA stands out as the most promising approach for indoor production of small, precise parts.
“they ultimately determined that SLA stands out as the most promising approach for the indoor production of small, precise parts.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [287]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 26
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Crawley, E., Cameron, B., Selva, D., Marketing, F., Demetrius, M., 2016. Strategy and Product Development for Complex Systems. Pearson Education.
- Cullingford, H.S., Keller, M.D., 1992. Lunar Concrete for Construction. 2nd Conf. Lunar Bases Sp. Act. 497-499.
- Sitta, L.A., Lavagna, M., 2018. 3D printing of Moon highlands regolith simulant. Proc. Int. Astronaut. Congr. IAC 2018-Octob, 1-5.
- Sun, H., Yi, M., Shen, Z., Zhang, X., Ma, S., 2017b. Developing a new controllable lunar dust simulant: BHLD20. Planet. Space Sci. 141, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.04.010 · DOI
- Yunus, D.E., He, R., Shi, W., Kaya, O., Liu, Y., 2017. Short fiber reinforced 3d printed ceramic composite with shear induced alignment. Ceram. Int. 43, 11766-11772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.012 · DOI
- Authors
- Isachenkov, M., Gorokh, I., Makarov, E., Verkhoturov, D., Khmelenko, P., Garzaniti, N., & Golkar, A.
- Affiliations
- Politecnico di Milano (IT)
- Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
- National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
- Cranfield University (GB)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Isachenkov, Maxim
- Venue
- Advances in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-03
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2656-2668
- ISSN
- 0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4289445339
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Keywords
- in-situ resource utilization, lunar regolith, additive manufacturing, 3D printing, lunar base construction, stereolithography, lunar regolith simulant, compressive strength, energy consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
