L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lee's (2003) recent investigation into Hong Kong teachers' perspectives and practices regarding error feedback has shown that most teachers mark errors comprehensively and prefer error codes.
“Lee's (2003) recent investigation into Hong Kong teachers' perspectives and practices regarding error feedback has shown that most teachers mark errors comprehensively and prefer error codes.”
From Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think? (2005) · cites this paper as Lee's (2003)
Many teachers are not satisfied with their own error correction practices and believe that they need help and guidance to tackle this time-consuming aspect of their work.
“Many teachers, however, are not satisfied with their own error correction practices and believe that they need help and guidance to tackle this time-consuming aspect of their work.”
From Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think? (2005) · cites this paper as Lee's (2003)
Cites
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think?
Lee, I. (2005) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Lee, I.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Icy
- ORCID
- Lee, Icy
- Venue
- Assessing Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 216-237
- ISSN
- 1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1976533545
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 14.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
- Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- error feedback, error correction, second language writing, teacher beliefs, teacher practices, writing assessment, high school English teachers, Hong Kong, teacher perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
