The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automated essay scoring: Psychometric guidelines and practices
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (2005) · Cited by 2,327
Shanahan, C. R. (2011) · Cited by 866
AUTOMATED ESSAY SCORING WITH E‐RATER® V.2.0
Attali, Y., & Burstein, J. C. (2004) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2004.tb01972.x · Cited by 641
Rating the ratings: Assessing the psychometric quality of rating data.
Saal, F. E., Downey, R. G., & Lahey, M. A. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.413 · Cited by 545
Shermis, M. D., & Burstein, J. C. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606860 · Cited by 512
Shanahan, T. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/681130 · Cited by 469
(1966) · Phi Delta Kappan · Cited by 449
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Pearson (2009, March). PTE academic automated scoring. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonpte.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/AutomatedScoringUS.pdf
- Stalnaker, 1936, The problem of the English examination, Educational Record, 17, 35
- Williamson, 2010, Automated Scoring for the Assessment of Common Core Standards
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9 · Cited by 993
A hierarchical classification approach to automated essay scoring
McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., Allen, L. K., & Dai, J. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.09.002 · Cited by 243
Shermis, M. D. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001 · Cited by 227
Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly
ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.3795 · Cited by 180
Graduate Theses and Dissertations
Davis, M., Davis, K. J., & Dunagan, M. M. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-384727-0.00006-9 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramineni, C., & Williamson, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Educational Testing Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ramineni, Chaitanya
- Venue
- Assessing Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-39
- ISSN
- 1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088070094
- Cited by
- 127
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Educational Testing Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- automated essay scoring, e-rater, psychometric assessment, writing assessment, large-scale assessment, performance expectations, Educational Testing Service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
