Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Diagnosis of grape leaf diseases using automatic K-means clustering and machine learning

Open access
Javidan, Seyed Mohamad, Banakar, Ahmad, Vakilian, Keyvan Asefpour, Ampatzidis, Yiannis·2023·Smart Agricultural Technology

Abstract

Plant diseases often reduce crop yield and product quality; therefore, plant disease diagnosis plays a vital role in farmers’ management decisions. Visual crop inspections by humans are time-consuming and challenging tasks and, practically, can only be performed in small areas at a given time, especially since many diseases have similar symptoms. An intelligent machine vision monitoring system for automatic inspection can be a great help for farmers in this regard. Although many algorithms have been introduced for plant disease diagnosis in recent years, a simple method relying on minimal information from the images is of interest for field conditions. In this study, a novel image processing algorithm and multi-class support vector machine (SVM) were used to diagnose and classify grape leaf diseases, i.e., black measles, black rot, and leaf blight. The area of disease symptoms was separated from the healthy parts of the leaf utilizing K-means clustering automatically, and then the features were extracted in three color models, namely RGB, HSV, and l*a*b. As an efficient classification method, SVM was used in this study, where principal component analysis (PCA) was performed for feature dimension reduction. Finally, the most important features were selected by the relief feature selection. Gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features resulted in an accuracy of 98.71%, while feature dimension reduction using PCA resulted in an accuracy of 98.97%. The proposed method was compared with two deep learning methods, i.e., CNN and GoogleNet, which achieved classification accuracies of 86.82% and 94.05%, respectively, while the processing time for the proposed method was significantly shorter than those of these models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atech.2022.100081

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Metadata

Authors
Javidan, S. M., Banakar, A., Vakilian, K. A., & Ampatzidis, Y.
Venue
Smart Agricultural Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
3
Pages
100081
ISSN
2772-3755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281795648
Cited by
258
References
44
FWCI
26.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of grape leaf diseases using automatic K-means clustering and machine learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100081
The paper
Javidan, S. M., Banakar, A., Vakilian, K. A., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2023). Diagnosis of grape leaf diseases using automatic K-means clustering and machine learning. Smart Agricultural Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100081

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.