The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey on using deep learning techniques for plant disease diagnosis and recommendations for development of appropriate tools
Open accessAbstract
Several factors associated with disease diagnosis in plants using deep learning techniques must be considered to develop a robust system for accurate disease management. A considerable number of studies have investigated the potential of deep learning techniques for precision agriculture in the last decade. However, despite the range of applications, several gaps within plant disease research are yet to be addressed to support disease management on farms. Thus, there is a need to establish a knowledge base of existing applications and identify the challenges and opportunities to help advance the development of tools that address farmers' needs. This study presents a comprehensive overview of 70 studies on deep learning applications and the trends associated with their use for disease diagnosis and management in agriculture. The studies were sourced from four indexing services, namely Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, and Google Scholar, and 11 main keywords used were Plant Diseases, Precision Agriculture, Unmanned Aerial System (UAS), Imagery Datasets, Image Processing, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, Transfer Learning, Image Classification, Object Detection, and Semantic Segmentation. The review is focused on providing a detailed assessment and considerations for developing deep learning-based tools for plant disease diagnosis in the form of seven key questions pertaining to (i) dataset requirements, availability, and usability, (ii) imaging sensors and data collection platforms, (iii) deep learning techniques, (iv) generalization of deep learning models, (v) disease severity estimation, (vi) deep learning and human accuracy comparison, and (vii) open research topics. These questions can help address existing research gaps by guiding further development and application of tools to support plant disease diagnosis and provide disease management support to farmers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.01497 · Cited by 70,812
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, A., Saraswat, D., & El Gamal, A.
- Venue
- Smart Agricultural Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 100083
- ISSN
- 2772-3755 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4282974753
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on using deep learning techniques for plant disease diagnosis and recommendations for development of appropriate tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100083
- The paper
- Ahmad, A., Saraswat, D., & El Gamal, A. (2023). A survey on using deep learning techniques for plant disease diagnosis and recommendations for development of appropriate tools. Smart Agricultural Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.