Digital twin-based intelligent fish farming with Artificial Intelligence Internet of Things (AIoT)
Open accessAbstract
This paper focuses on designing a Digital Twin infrastructure that supports an agile-based Artificial Intelligence Internet of Things (AIoT) system for intelligent fish farming in aquaculture. Our infrastructure includes the Internet of Things, cloud technology, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as its building blocks. Our physical entity is equipped with smart devices such as sensors and actuators embedded in smart machines (fish feeding and sorting machines) that collect and transmits big data to the cloud using wireless communication networks for real-time and remote monitoring. We have four major digital twin services: fish feeding to automate the feeding process, metric estimation (fish count, size, and weight), environmental monitoring (water condition, net hole, and green algae), and health monitoring (vitality, mortality, and diseases). Each digital twin service is equipped with multiple AI services (or the digital twin objects) capable of performing complex and other functions such as optimizations, predictions, and analyses for intelligent decision-making to optimize farm profits and production. We integrated a prototype that represents the virtual entity accessible using the web and mobile devices where users can perform fish farm monitoring using the various digital twin services and their related AI services.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of ADT subproducts to their full potential may be constrained for financial reasons, necessitating a compromise between price and capability.
“Because of this, the use of ADT subproducts to their full potential may be constrained for financial reasons, necessitating a compromise between price and capability [4,10].”
From Reinvigorating algal cultivation for biomass production with digital twin technology - a smart sustainable infrastructure (2024) · cites this paper as [4]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Ubina, N. A., Lan, H.-Y., Cheng, S.-C., Chang, C.-C., Lin, S.-S., Zhang, K.-X., Lu, H.-Y., Cheng, C.-Y., & Hsieh, Y.-Z.
- Affiliations
- Isabela State University (PH)
- National Taiwan Ocean University (TW)
- National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Cheng, Shyi-Chyi
- ORCID
- Venue
- Smart Agricultural Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-10
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 100285
- ISSN
- 2772-3755 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4383677231
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Smart Agricultural Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 111-2221-E-019 -068 -MY3)
- Council of Agriculture (112AS-6.1.1-FA-F4)
- Fisheries Agency,Council of Agriculture
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- digital twin, aquaculture, automated fish feeding, fish sorting, water quality monitoring, fish health monitoring, remote monitoring, cloud computing, wireless sensor networks, decision support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review