Cited by 82Water Quality Monitoring TechnologiesSmart Agriculture and AIDigital Transformation in Industry

Digital twin-based intelligent fish farming with Artificial Intelligence Internet of Things (AIoT)

Open access
Ubina, Naomi A., Lan, Hsun-Yu, Cheng, Shyi-Chyi, Chang, Chin-Chun, Lin, Shih-Syun, Zhang, Kai-Xiang, Lu, Hoang-Yang, Cheng, Chih-Yung +1 more·2023·Smart Agricultural Technology

Abstract

This paper focuses on designing a Digital Twin infrastructure that supports an agile-based Artificial Intelligence Internet of Things (AIoT) system for intelligent fish farming in aquaculture. Our infrastructure includes the Internet of Things, cloud technology, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) as its building blocks. Our physical entity is equipped with smart devices such as sensors and actuators embedded in smart machines (fish feeding and sorting machines) that collect and transmits big data to the cloud using wireless communication networks for real-time and remote monitoring. We have four major digital twin services: fish feeding to automate the feeding process, metric estimation (fish count, size, and weight), environmental monitoring (water condition, net hole, and green algae), and health monitoring (vitality, mortality, and diseases). Each digital twin service is equipped with multiple AI services (or the digital twin objects) capable of performing complex and other functions such as optimizations, predictions, and analyses for intelligent decision-making to optimize farm profits and production. We integrated a prototype that represents the virtual entity accessible using the web and mobile devices where users can perform fish farm monitoring using the various digital twin services and their related AI services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atech.2023.100285

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 82

Authors
Ubina, N. A., Lan, H.-Y., Cheng, S.-C., Chang, C.-C., Lin, S.-S., Zhang, K.-X., Lu, H.-Y., Cheng, C.-Y., & Hsieh, Y.-Z.
Affiliations
  • Isabela State University (PH)
  • National Taiwan Ocean University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Shyi-Chyi
Venue
Smart Agricultural Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
5
Pages
100285
ISSN
2772-3755 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383677231
Cited by
82
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 4
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Smart Agricultural Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 111-2221-E-019 -068 -MY3)
  • Council of Agriculture (112AS-6.1.1-FA-F4)
  • Fisheries Agency,Council of Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
Keywords
digital twin, aquaculture, automated fish feeding, fish sorting, water quality monitoring, fish health monitoring, remote monitoring, cloud computing, wireless sensor networks, decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review