Cited by 123Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the incidence of cardiovascular disease in an urban Japanese cohort study: The Suita study

Okamura, Tomonori, Kokubo, Yoshihiro, Watanabe, Makoto, Higashiyama, Aya, Miyamoto, Yoshihiro, Yoshimasa, Yasunao, Okayama, Akira·2009·Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Objective Only a small number of population-based cohort studies have directly compared the predictive value of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDLC) for coronary artery disease in Asian populations, such as Japan.Methods We performed an 11.9-year cohort study of 4694 men and women, aged 30-74 years, selected randomly from an urban general population in Japan. Baseline LDL-C levels were estimated using the Friedewald formula. The predictive values of LDL-C and non-HDLC for myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke were compared.Results and conclusion During the follow-up period, there were 80 incident cases of MI and 139 of stoke, comprised of 23 intracerebral hemorrhages, 85 cerebral infarctions and 31 other types of stroke. The Hazard ratio (HR) for MI was highest in the top quintile of LDL-C (HR: 3.03, 95% CI, 1.32-6.96) when male and female data were combined. The HR for MI was also highest in the top quintile of non-HDLC (HR: 2.97, 95% CI, 1.26-6.97). Analysis of trends showed a significant positive relationship between MI incidence and serum LDL-C and non-HDLC levels (both P=0.02). However, there was no relationship between the incidence of any subtype of stroke and either LDL-C or non-HDLC. The predictive value of LDL-C and non-HDLC for MI, assessed by calculating the differences in the -2 logarithm likelihood (-2ln [L]) and area under the curve (AUC), were almost similar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.07.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 123

Authors
Okamura, T., Kokubo, Y., Watanabe, M., Higashiyama, A., Miyamoto, Y., Yoshimasa, Y., & Okayama, A.
Affiliations
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
  • Japan Anti Tuberculosis Association (JP)
Corresponding author
Okamura, Tomonori
Venue
Atherosclerosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
203
Issue
2
Pages
587-592
ISSN
0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969158757
Cited by
123
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Atherosclerosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Keywords
LDL cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk prediction, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery disease, Friedewald formula, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral infarction, Asian populations, Suita Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Female, Humans, Japan, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk, Urban Population, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review