Differential metabolic effects of pravastatin and simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients
Open accessAbstract
Background Lipophilic and hydrophilic statins have different effects on adiponectin and insulin resistance in experimental studies and different effects on the rate of onset of new diabetes in large scale clinical studies. Therefore, we hypothesized that simvastatin and pravastatin may have differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients.Methods This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Age, gender, and body mass index were matched. Forty-three patients were given placebo, simvastatin 20mg, or pravastatin 40 mg, respectively once daily for 2 months.Results Simvastatin and pravastatin therapy significantly changed lipoprotein levels and improved flow-mediated dilation after 2 months when compared with baseline (P<0.001) or placebo treatment (P<0.001 by ANOVA). Simvastatin therapy significantly increased insulin levels (mean % changes; 127%, P=0.014) and decreased plasma adiponectin levels (10%, P=0.012) and insulin sensitivity as assessed by QUICKI (6%, P=0.007) when compared with baseline. By contrast, pravastatin therapy did not significantly change insulin levels (-3%, P=0.437) but significantly increased plasma adiponectin levels (9%, P=0.011) and insulin sensitivity (6%, P=0.008) when compared with baseline. In addition, these effects of simvastatin were significant when compared with pravastatin (P<0.001 for insulin levels by ANOVA on Ranks, P<0.001 for adiponectin and P=0.001 for QUICKI by ANOVA). When compared with baseline, simvastatin significantly increased plasma leptin levels (35%, P=0.028), but pravastatin did not (1%, P=0.822).Conclusions Despite causing comparable changes in lipoprotein and endothelium-dependent dilation, simvastatin and pravastatin therapy had differential metabolic effects in hypercholesterolemic patients that may be clinically relevant.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies by Koh et al. used the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index as a surrogate measure for insulin sensitivity, while Ohrvall et al. used the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique.
“The 3 studies by Koh et al. (19,20,22) from 2008, 2009, and 2010 used the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index as a surrogate measure for insulin sensitivity, whereas the study by Ohrvall et al. (21) from 1995 used the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique.”
From Simvastatin Effects on Skeletal Muscle (2013) · cites this paper as [19]
Statin treatment has been reported to impair insulin sensitivity and increase type 2 diabetes prevalence, with lipophilic statins having a stronger effect than hydrophilic statins.
“Recently, it has been reported that statin treatment impairs insulin sensitivity and increases the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (19 -22); and it seems that lipophilic statins (i.e., simvastatin, atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin) have a more pronounced effect on insulin sensitivity compared with hydrophilic statins (i.e., pravastatin, rosuvastatin) (23).”
From Simvastatin Effects on Skeletal Muscle (2013) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Koh, K. K., Quon, M. J., Han, S. H., Lee, Y., Kim, S. J., Park, J. B., & Shin, E. K.
- Affiliations
- Gachon University (KR)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Ewha Womans University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Koh, Kwang Kon
- Venue
- Atherosclerosis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-06
- Volume
- 204
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 483-490
- ISSN
- 0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2751605
- OpenAlex
- W2035557600
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Atherosclerosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Gachon University
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Z01AT000001)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Keywords
- simvastatin, pravastatin, statins, hypercholesterolemia, adiponectin, insulin resistance, QUICKI, leptin, lipoproteins, flow-mediated dilation, endothelial function, insulin levels, lipid-lowering therapy
- MeSH terms
- C-Reactive Protein, Double-Blind Method, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Lipoproteins, Male, Middle Aged, Vasodilation, Treatment Outcome, Pravastatin, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Leptin, Adiponectin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review