Cited by 21Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics

Extent of undertreatment and overtreatment with cholesterol-lowering therapy according to European guidelines in 92,348 Danes without ischemic cardiovascular disease and diabetes in 2004–2014

Langsted, Anne, Freiberg, Jacob J., Nordestgaard, Børge G.·2017·Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Background and aims We estimated the extent of undertreatment and overtreatment with cholesterol-lowering therapy according to European guidelines in individuals in the Danish general population without ischemic cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Methods We examined 92,348 such individuals aged 35-100 years recruited from 2004 through 2014 in the Copenhagen General Population Study. Each individual was assigned their 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease according to the European SCORE chart based on age, sex, smoking, total cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure. European guidelines recommend cholesterol-lowering therapy definitely at ≥10% risk and LDL cholesterol ≥1.8 mmol/L, definitely at 5-9% risk and LDL cholesterol ≥2.5 mmol/L, possibly at 1-4% risk and LDL cholesterol ≥3 mmol/L, but not at Results 3858 individuals had ≥10% risk, 16,255 had 5-9% risk, 49,131 had 1-4% risk, and 23,104 had Conclusions In the Danish general population, ∼190,000 per million 35-100 year olds without ischemic cardiovascular disease and diabetes are not treated to LDL cholesterol goals according to European guidelines. Conversely, ∼1600 per million received cholesterol-lowering therapy without endorsement in European guidelines.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.11.025

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a Danish study of more than 90,000 patients, 81% of primary prevention patients with a 10-year risk greater than 10% for a cardiovascular event were not treated to LDL-C goals according to the European guidelines.

    “In a Danish study of more than 90 000 patients, 81% of primary prevention patients with a 10-year risk greater than 10% for a cardiovascular event were not treated to LDL-C goals according to the European guidelines.17”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langsted, A., Freiberg, J. J., & Nordestgaard, B. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Nordestgaard, Børge G.
Venue
Atherosclerosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
257
Pages
9-15
ISSN
0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556345505
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Atherosclerosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Society of Cardiology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Keywords
cholesterol-lowering therapy, undertreatment, overtreatment, LDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk, SCORE risk chart, European guidelines, statin prescribing, primary prevention, general population, Denmark
MeSH terms
Medical Overuse, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anticholesteremic Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Denmark, Female, Health Services Misuse, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Risk Factors, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation, Treatment Outcome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Risk Assessment, Guideline Adherence, Dyslipidemias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review