Cited by 11Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealthcare Policy and Management

Favorable cardiovascular risk factor profile is associated with lower healthcare expenditure and resource utilization among adults with diabetes mellitus free of established cardiovascular disease: 2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)

Open access
Feldman, David I., Valero-Elizondo, Javier, Salami, Joseph A., Rana, Jamal S., Ogunmoroti, Oluseye, Osondu, Chukwuemeka U., Spatz, Erica S., Virani, Salim S. +4 more·2017·Atherosclerosis

Abstract

Background and aims Given the prevalence and economic burden of diabetes mellitus (DM), we studied the impact of a favorable cardiovascular risk factor (CRF) profile on healthcare expenditures and resource utilization among individuals without cardiovascular disease (CVD), by DM status. Methods 25,317 participants were categorized into 3 mutually-exclusive strata: "Poor", "Average" and "Optimal" CRF profiles (≥4, 2-3, 0-1 CRF, respectively). Two-part econometric models were utilized to study cost data. Results Mean age was 45 (48% male), with 54% having optimal, 39% average, and 7% poor CRF profiles. Individuals with DM were more likely to have poor CRF profile vs. those without DM (OR 7.7, 95% CI 6.4, 9.2). Individuals with DM/poor CRF profile had a mean annual expenditure of $9,006, compared to $6,461 among those with DM/optimal CRF profile (p Conclusions A favorable CRF profile is associated with significantly lower healthcare expenditures and utilization in CVD-free individuals across DM status, suggesting that these individuals require aggressive individualized prescriptions targeting lifestyle modifications and therapeutic treatments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.02.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reducing cardiovascular risk may reduce healthcare expenditures, which may unburden both patients and the U.S. health care system at large.

    “Moreover, reducing cardiovascular risk may reduce healthcare expenditures, which may unburden both patients and the U.S. health care system at large [49], [50], [51].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feldman, D. I., Valero-Elizondo, J., Salami, J. A., Rana, J. S., Ogunmoroti, O., Osondu, C. U., Spatz, E. S., Virani, S. S., Blankstein, R., Blaha, M. J., Veledar, E., & Nasir, K.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Nasir, Khurram
Venue
Atherosclerosis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
258
Pages
79-83
ISSN
0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2586870865
Cited by
11
References
3
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atherosclerosis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • FIU - Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular risk factors, health care expenditure, healthcare resource utilization, cardiovascular disease, economic burden of diabetes, lifestyle modification, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Health Expenditures, Female, Health Resources, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Cost Savings, Health Care Costs, Process Assessment, Health Care, Risk Assessment, Models, Economic, Health Care Surveys, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review