Calcium deposition within coronary atherosclerotic lesion: Implications for plaque stability
Abstract
Atherosclerotic lesion progression is associated with intimal calcification. The earliest lesion that shows calcification is pathologic intimal thickening in which calcifications appear as microcalcifications that vary in size from 15 μm to 1 mm in diameter), fragmented (>1 mm), and eventually sheet-like calcification (>3 mm). When stratified by plaque type, maximum calcifications are observed in fibrocalcific plaques, followed by healed plaque ruptures. Lesions of acute thrombi, i.e., plaque rupture and erosions, which are the most frequent causes of acute coronary syndromes, show much less calcification than stable fibrocalcific plaques. Conversely, a calcified nodule, the least common lesion of acute thrombosis, occurs in highly calcified lesions. Pro-inflammatory cytokines observed in unstable plaques may provoke an early phase of osteogenic differentiation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), a release of calcifying extracellular matrix vesicles, and/or induce apoptosis of macrophages and SMCs, which also calcify. Recent pathologic and imaging based studies indicate that lesions with dense calcifications are more likely to be stable plaques (fibrocalcific plaques), while micro, punctate, or fragmented calcifications are associated with either early stage plaques or unstable lesions (plaque rupture or erosion). Clinical non-invasive computed tomography (CT) studies show that the greater the calcium score, the higher the likelihood of patients developing future acute coronary ev…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Partially calcified and noncalcified plaques are more vulnerable to plaque rupture than calcified plaques.
“This is clinically relevant because these plaque types are more vulnerable to plaque rupture than calcified plaques.10,11”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 71 · Cited by 195
- Authors
- Jinnouchi, H., Sato, Y., Sakamoto, A., Cornelissen, A., Mori, M., Kawakami, R., Gadhoke, N. V., Kolodgie, F. D., Virmani, R., & Finn, A. V.
- Affiliations
- CVPath Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Finn, Aloke V.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Atherosclerosis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 306
- Pages
- 85-95
- ISSN
- 0021-9150 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3034438778
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Atherosclerosis (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, intimal calcification, plaque stability, coronary artery calcium, microcalcifications, fibrocalcific plaque, plaque rupture, plaque erosion, acute coronary syndrome, calcified nodules, macrophage apoptosis, matrix vesicles, inflammatory cytokines, necrotic core
- MeSH terms
- Calcinosis, Calcium, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Vessels, Humans, Osteogenesis, Atherosclerosis, Plaque, Atherosclerotic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review