Cited by 70Nerve Injury and RehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentAnesthesia and Pain Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neurectomy for Treatment of Intercostal Neuralgia

Abstract

Background Intercostal neuralgia due to surgical injury of the intercostal nerve is difficult to treat. No treatment modality has given effective pain relief. Experience with other painful neuromas has demonstrated that neuroma resection and muscle implantation has been effective in the upper and lower extremities. This approach was applied to patients with intercostal neuralgia.Methods A retrospective review was done of 5 consecutive patients who have had neurectomy of one or more intercostal nerves. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels, patient demographics, length of follow-up, and surgical technique were reviewed.Results Average patient age was 51.0 years (range, 39.2 to 61.3). Patients presented an average of 42.8 months (range, 10 to 138) after the surgical procedure or trauma that created their painful intercostal neuromas. The mean maximum pain level was 10, and the mean average pain level was 8 (range, 7 to 9). Postoperatively, the mean maximum pain level was 3.4 (range, 0 to 9), and the mean average pain level was 2.2 (range, 0 to 7). The differences were significant: p less than 0.01 for maximum pain level and p less than 0.05 for average pain level. Average follow-up after surgery was 8.8 months (range, 6.5 to 10.9). The most common surgical technique used was intercostal nerve neurectomy proximal to the intercostal nerve neuroma and implantation of the cut nerve into the latissimus dorsi muscle.Conclusions Intercostal neurectomy and implantation of the cut nerve into the latissimus dorsi or into the rib for severe intercostal neuralgia was an efficacious treatment in this small consecutive patient series.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.058

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Williams, E. H., Williams, C. G., Rosson, G. D., Heitmiller, R. F., & Dellon, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Dellon Institutes for Peripheral Nerve Surgery (US)
  • MedStar Union Memorial Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Eric H.
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
1766-1770
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119055281
Cited by
70
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
intercostal neuralgia, neurectomy, surgical trauma, postoperative pain relief, chronic pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intercostal Nerves, Male, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Neuroma, Pain Measurement, Peripheral Nervous System Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications, Reoperation, Ribs, Muscle, Skeletal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review