Cited by 120Cardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsAortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesCongenital Heart Disease Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Concentric Left Ventricular Remodeling on Early Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement

Open access
Duncan, Andra Ibrahim, Lowe, Boris S., Garcia, Mario J., Xu, Meng, Gillinov, A. Marc, Mihaljevic, Tomislav, Koch, Colleen G.·2008·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Background Severe left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy increases risk for adverse outcome after aortic valve replacement. Whether LV geometry influences mortality risk after aortic valve replacement is unclear. And, whether LV mass or relative wall thickness (RWT) better predicts risk for adverse postoperative outcomes is unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to examine the influence of LV geometry and LV hypertrophy on morbidity and in-hospital mortality after aortic valve replacement, and to determine whether LV mass or RWT had better prognostic ability.Methods Between January 1996 and June 2004, 5,083 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Preoperative echocardiographic data was used to calculate LV mass and RWT. Left ventricular geometry was classified into one of four categories on the basis of LV mass indexed to body height and RWT: (1) concentric hypertrophy, (2) eccentric hypertrophy, (3) concentric remodeling, and (4) normal. Postoperative mortality and multisystem morbidities of patients with concentric geometries were compared to patients with nonconcentric geometries by propensity and logistic regression modeling. Also, prognostic ability of RWT and LV mass was compared.Results Nine hundred sixty-four patients with concentric geometry were propensity-matched to 964 patients with nonconcentric geometry. In-hospital mortality (38 [3.9%] versus 18 [1.9%]; p = 0.007), cardiac morbidity (33 [3.4%] versus 17 [1.8%]; p = 0.022), and prolonged intubation (85 [8.8%] versus 58 [6.0%]; p = 0.019) were higher in patients with concentric versus nonconcentric geometry. Increasing RWT, not LV mass, was associated with adverse outcomes.Conclusions Concentric geometries are associated with increased risk for in-hospital mortality after aortic valve replacement. Increased RWT is associated with adverse outcomes. Preoperative risk stratification should include assessments of LV hypertrophy and LV geometry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.02.075

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–120 of 120

Metadata

Authors
Duncan, A. I., Lowe, B. S., Garcia, M. J., Xu, M., Gillinov, A. M., Mihaljevic, T., & Koch, C. G.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Duncan, Andra Ibrahim
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
85
Issue
6
Pages
2030-2039
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155083218
Cited by
120
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Keywords
aortic valve replacement, left ventricular remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricular mass, relative wall thickness, left ventricular geometry, in-hospital mortality, postoperative morbidity, prolonged intubation, preoperative risk stratification, prognosis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Cardiac Output, Low, Cause of Death, Echocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Postoperative Complications, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Hospital Mortality, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular, Echocardiography, Doppler, Color, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Ventricular Remodeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review