Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blood Transfusion and Infection After Cardiac Surgery

Open access
Horvath, Keith A., Acker, Michael A., Chang, Helena, Bagiella, Emilia, Smith, Peter K., Iribarne, Alexander, Kron, Irving L., Lackner, Pamela, Argenziano, Michael, Ascheim, Deborah D., Gelijns, Annetine C., Michler, Robert E., Van Patten, Danielle, Puskas, John D., O'Sullivan, Karen, Kliniewski, Dorothy, Jeffries, Neal O., O'Gara, Patrick T., Moskowitz, Alan J., Blackstone, Eugene H.·2013·The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Abstract

Cardiac surgery is the largest consumer of blood products in medicine; although believed life saving, transfusion carries substantial adverse risks. This study characterizes the relationship between transfusion and risk of major infection after cardiac surgery. 5,158 adults were prospectively enrolled to assess infections after cardiac surgery. The most common procedures were isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (31%) and isolated valve surgery (30%); 19% were reoperations. Infections were adjudicated by independent infectious disease experts. Multivariable Cox modeling was used to assess the independent effect of blood and platelet transfusions on major infections within 60±5 days of surgery. Red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets were transfused in 48% and 31% of patients, respectively. Each RBC unit transfused was associated with a 29% increase in crude risk of major infection (P<0.001). Among RBC recipients, the most common infections were pneumonia (3.6%) and bloodstream infections (2%). Risk factors for infection included postoperative RBC units transfused, longer duration of surgery, and transplant or ventricular assist device implantation, in addition to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, and elevated preoperative creatinine. Platelet transfusion decreased the risk of infection (P=.02). Greater attention to management practices that limit RBC use, including cell salvage, small priming volumes, vacuum-assisted venous return with rapid autologous priming, and ultrafiltration, and pre- and intraoperative measures to elevate hematocrit could potentially reduce occurrence of major postoperative infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.078

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Horvath, K. A., Acker, M. A., Chang, H., Bagiella, E., Smith, P. K., Iribarne, A., Kron, I. L., Lackner, P., Argenziano, M., Ascheim, D. D., Gelijns, A. C., Michler, R. E., Van Patten, D., Puskas, J. D., O'Sullivan, K., Kliniewski, D., Jeffries, N. O., O'Gara, P. T., Moskowitz, A. J., & Blackstone, E. H.
Venue
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
95
Issue
6
Pages
2194-2201
ISSN
0003-4975 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074857397
Cited by
306
References
33
FWCI
20.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blood Transfusion and Infection After Cardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.078
The paper
Horvath, K. A., Acker, M. A., Chang, H., Bagiella, E., Smith, P. K., Iribarne, A., Kron, I. L., Lackner, P., Argenziano, M., Ascheim, D. D., Gelijns, A. C., Michler, R. E., Van Patten, D., Puskas, J. D., O'Sullivan, K., Kliniewski, D., Jeffries, N. O., O'Gara, P. T., Moskowitz, A. J., & Blackstone, E. H. (2013). Blood Transfusion and Infection After Cardiac Surgery. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.078

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.