Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 216 of the 216 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in China: A review

Li, Yong Jie, Sun, Yele, Zhang, Qi, Li, Xue, Li, Mei, Zhou, Zhen, Chan, Chak K.·2017·Atmospheric Environment

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027

Cites

216 of 216 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 216 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., & Chan, C. K.
Venue
Atmospheric Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
158
Pages
270-304
ISSN
1352-2310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2589694543
Cited by
264
References
216
FWCI
16.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in China: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027
The paper
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., & Chan, C. K. (2017). Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in China: A review. Atmospheric Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.