The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The project benefits of Building Information Modelling (BIM)
Bryde, D., Broquetas, M., & Volm, J. M. (2013) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.001 · Cited by 1,268
Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review
Opoku, D.-G. J., Perera, S., Osei-Kyei, R., & Rashidi, M. (2021) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102726 · Cited by 753
Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions
Lu, Y., Wu, Z., Chang, R., & Li, Y. (2017) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.024 · Cited by 555
Ghimire, P., Kim, K., & Acharya, M. (2024) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings14010220 · Cited by 175
Blockchain-Enabled Information Sharing Within a Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review
Wan, P. K., Huang, L., & Holtskog, H. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2980142 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Succar, B.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-375
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114734902
- Cited by
- 1,741
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 48.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
- The paper
- Succar, B. (2009). Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
