The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A mixed review of the adoption of Building Information Modelling (BIM) for sustainability
Chong, H.-Y., Lee, C.-Y., & Wang, X. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.222 · Cited by 371
Data acquisition technologies for construction progress tracking
Omar, T., & Nehdi, M. L. (2016) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.06.016 · Cited by 284
Image-Driven Fuzzy-Based System to Construct as-Is IFC BIM Objects
Lu, Q., Lee, S., & Chen, L. (2018) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.034 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Bosché, F., Ahmed, M., Turkan, Y., Haas, C. T., & Haas, R.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 49
- Pages
- 201-213
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968200193
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014
- The paper
- Bosché, F., Ahmed, M., Turkan, Y., Haas, C. T., & Haas, R. (2015). The value of integrating Scan-to-BIM and Scan-vs-BIM techniques for construction monitoring using laser scanning and BIM: The case of cylindrical MEP components. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
