CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43BIM and Construction Integration3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications

Prioritizing object types for modelling existing industrial facilities

Open access
Agapaki, Eva, Miatt, Graham, Brilakis, Ioannis·2018·Automation in Construction
DOI 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.09.011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.09.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although these processes are automated, they are still time-consuming when compared to employing digital models generated using BIM.

    “It is observed that although these processes are automated, they are still time-consuming when compared to employing digital models generated using BIM.”

    From A review of digital twin applications in construction (2022) · cites this paper as Agapaki et al., 2018

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A review of digital twin applications in construction

    Madubuike, O. C., Anumba, C. J., & Khallaf, R. (2022) · Journal of Information Technology in Construction · doi:10.36680/j.itcon.2022.008 · Cited by 147 · see citing works

    “This was determined by Agapaki et al. (2018) who identified that the man-hours spent in modeling 53,834 pipes were around 5,200 labor hours, which can be employed in other productive areas if the digital models of the facilities are available. However, efforts are being made to automate the modeling process of existin…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

Authors
Agapaki, E., Miatt, G., & Brilakis, I.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Agapaki, Eva
ORCID
Venue
Automation in Construction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
96
Pages
211-223
ISSN
0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.autcon.2018.09.011
OpenAlex
W2895459625
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Automation in Construction (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  • AVEVA Group Plc. (RG83104)
  • BP International Centre for Business and Technology (RG90532)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › 3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Keywords
cylinder detection, pipes, electrical conduits, circular hollow sections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review