The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action recognition of earthmoving excavators based on sequential pattern analysis of visual features and operation cycles
Abstract
Abstract This paper proposes a vision-based action recognition framework that considers the sequential working patterns of earthmoving excavators for automated cycle time and productivity analysis. The sequential patterns of visual features and operation cycles are incorporated into the action recognition framework, which includes three main processes: excavator detection, excavator tracking, and excavator action recognition. The first process uses a pre-trained detector to localize earthmoving excavators on sites from all of captured images. Next, the detection results are associated and the excavators are tracked by Tracking-Learning-Detection algorithm. Lastly, to recognize the operation types of the excavators, their sequential patterns of visual features and operation cycles are modeled and trained with a hybrid deep learning algorithm, i.e., Convolutional Neural Networks and Double-layer Long Short Term Memory. Three experiments were performed to validate the proposed framework and confirm the positive effects of sequential modeling: (1) an experiment without sequential pattern analysis, (2) an experiment with the sequential pattern analysis of visual features, and (3) an experiment with the sequential pattern analysis of visual features and operation cycles. In the experiments, the research team used a total of 72,365 images collected from actual earthmoving sites. The average accuracies of the excavator action recognition in the three cases were 79.8%, 90.9%, and 93.8% respectively. The results demonstrated the applicability of the proposed framework and the significant positive impacts of sequential pattern modeling on the recognition performance. This research contributed to the identification of critical elements that explain sequential working patterns and to the development of a novel vision-based action recognition framework. In addition, the findings of this study can help to automate cycle time analysis and productivity monitoring of earthmoving excavators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., & Chi, S.
- Venue
- Automation in Construction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 104
- Pages
- 255-264
- ISSN
- 0926-5805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2942937015
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action recognition of earthmoving excavators based on sequential pattern analysis of visual features and operation cycles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.025
- The paper
- Kim, J., & Chi, S. (2019). Action recognition of earthmoving excavators based on sequential pattern analysis of visual features and operation cycles. Automation in Construction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.