CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 241Spacecraft Dynamics and ControlControl and Stability of Dynamical SystemsSpace Satellite Systems and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spacecraft attitude control using magnetic actuators

Lovera, M., Astolfi, A.·2004·Automatica
DOI 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.02.022
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.02.022

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lovera and Astolfi (2004) concluded that attitude stabilization can be achieved in the absence of other active and passive stabilization techniques such as momentum wheels or gravity booms for a magnetically actuated spacecraft.

    “Reference [Lovera and Astolfi, 2004] analyzes the effect of underactuation on a magnetically actuated spacecraft and concludes that attitude stabilization can be achieved in the absence of other active and passive stabilization techniques such as momentum wheels or gravity booms.”

    From 3CAT-2: Attitude Determination and Control System for a GNSS-R Earth Observation 6U CubeSat Mission (2016) · cites this paper as Lovera and Astolfi, 2004

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Akella, 2001, Rigid body attitude tracking without angular velocity feedback, Systems and Control Letters, 42, 321, 10.1016/S0167-6911(00)00102-X · DOI
  2. Arduini, 1997, Active magnetic damping attitude control for gravity gradient stabilised spacecraft, Journal of Guidance and Control, 20, 117, 10.2514/2.4003 · DOI
  3. Battilotti, 1996, Global output regulation and disturbance attenuation with global stability via measurement feedback for a class of nonlinear systems, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 315, 10.1109/9.486315 · DOI
  4. Byrnes, 1991, On the attitude stabilization of rigid spacecraft, Automatica, 27, 87, 10.1016/0005-1098(91)90008-P · DOI
  5. Caccavale, 1999, Output feedback control for attitude tracking, Systems and Control Letters, 39, 91, 10.1016/S0167-6911(99)00050-X · DOI
  6. Curti, F., & Diani, F. (1999). Study on active magnetic attitude control for the Italian spacecraft bus MITA. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Spaceflight Dynamics, Iguassu Falls, Brasil.
  7. Damaren, 2002, Comments on fully magnetic attitude control for spacecraft subject to gravity gradient, Automatica, 38, 2189, 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00146-2 · DOI
  8. Fjellstad, 1994, Comments on the attitude control problem, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39, 699, 10.1109/9.280793 · DOI
  9. Lizarralde, 1996, Attitude control without angular velocity measurement, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 468, 10.1109/9.486654 · DOI
  10. Lovera, M. (2003). Modelling and simulation of spacecraft attitude dynamics. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Mathematical Modelling, Vienna, Austria.
  11. Lovera, M., & Astolfi, A. (2001). Global attitude regulation using magnetic control. In IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Tampa, Florida, USA. · DOI
  12. Lovera, 2002, Periodic attitude control techniques for small satellites with magnetic actuators, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 10, 90, 10.1109/87.974341 · DOI
  13. Morin, 1995, Time-varying feedback stabilization of the attitude of a rigid spacecraft with two controls, Systems and Control Letters, 25, 375, 10.1016/0167-6911(94)00095-D · DOI
  14. Pittelkau, 1993, Optimal periodic control for spacecraft pointing and attitude determination, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 16, 1078, 10.2514/3.21130 · DOI
  15. Psiaki, 2001, Magnetic torquer attitude control via asymptotic periodic linear quadratic regulation, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 24, 386, 10.2514/2.4723 · DOI
  16. Steyn, 1994, Comparison of low Earth orbit satellite attitude controllers submitted to controllability constraints, Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 17, 795, 10.2514/3.21269 · DOI
  17. Wang, P., & Shtessel, Y. (1998). Satellite attitude control using only magnetic torquers. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Boston, USA. · DOI
  18. Wen, 1991, The attitude control problem, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36, 1148, 10.1109/9.90228 · DOI
  19. Wisniewski, 1999, Fully magnetic attitude control for spacecraft subject to gravity gradient, Automatica, 35, 1201, 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00021-7 · DOI
  20. Wisniewski, R., & Markley, L. M. (1999). Optimal magnetic attitude control. In 14th IFAC World Congress, Beijing, China. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lovera, M., & Astolfi, A.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Lovera, M.
ORCID
Venue
Automatica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
1405-1414
ISSN
0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.automatica.2004.02.022
OpenAlex
W2049274273
Cited by
241
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Automatica (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
spacecraft attitude control, magnetic actuators, velocity feedback, spacecraft attitude stabilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review