The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization over state feedback policies for robust control with constraints
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the optimal control of linear discrete-time systems subject to unknown but bounded state disturbances and mixed polytopic constraints on the state and input. It is shown that the class of admissible affine state feedback control policies with knowledge of prior states is equivalent to the class of admissible feedback policies that are affine functions of the past disturbance sequence. This implies that a broad class of constrained finite horizon robust and optimal control problems, where the optimization is over affine state feedback policies, can be solved in a computationally efficient fashion using convex optimization methods. This equivalence result is used to design a robust receding horizon control (RHC) state feedback policy such that the closed-loop system is input-to-state stable (ISS) and the constraints are satisfied for all time and all allowable disturbance sequences. The cost to be minimized in the associated finite horizon optimal control problem is quadratic in the disturbance-free state and input sequences. The value of the receding horizon control law can be calculated at each sample instant using a single, tractable and convex quadratic program (QP) if the disturbance set is polytopic, or a tractable second-order cone program (SOCP) if the disturbance set is given by a 2-norm bound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Cited by 22,203
Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality
Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. O. M. (2000) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00214-9 · Cited by 8,736
Predictive Control With Constraints
Maciejowski, J. M. (2001) · Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database · Cited by 4,368
Self-citationLee, J. H., Kaisare, N. S., & García, C. E. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394333325.fmatter · Cited by 3,766
Predictive control with constraints
Camacho, E. F. (2003) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00056-6 · Cited by 3,530
The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems
Bemporad, A., Morari, M., Dua, V., & Pistikopoulos, E. N. (2002) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00174-1 · Cited by 3,260
Optimization—Theory and Applications
Cesari, L. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8165-5 · Cited by 2,559
Robust constrained model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities
Kothare, M. V., Balakrishnan, V., & Morari, M. (1996) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(96)00063-5 · Cited by 2,516
Applications of second-order cone programming
Lobo, M. S., Vandenberghe, L., Boyd, S., & Lebret, H. (1998) · Linear Algebra and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0024-3795(98)10032-0 · Cited by 2,401
Cited by
Theory and applications of robust optimization
Bertsimas, D., Brown, D. B., & Caramanis, C. (2011) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734510 · Cited by 134
Robust MPC with data-driven demand forecasting for frequency regulation with heat pumps
Bünning, F., Warrington, J., Heer, P., Smith, R. S., & Lygeros, J. (2022) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2022.105101 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Goulart, P. J., Kerrigan, E. C., & Maciejowski, J. M.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-533
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110349823
- Cited by
- 580
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 39.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization over state feedback policies for robust control with constraints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.023
- The paper
- Goulart, P. J., Kerrigan, E. C., & Maciejowski, J. M. (2006). Optimization over state feedback policies for robust control with constraints. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2005.08.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.