The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherent quantum LQG control
Open accessAbstract
Based on a recently developed notion of physical realizability for quantum linear stochastic systems, we formulate a quantum LQG optimal control problem for quantum linear stochastic systems where the controller itself may also be a quantum system and the plant output signal can be fully quantum. Such a control scheme is often referred to in the quantum control literature as ''coherent feedback control''. It distinguishes the present work from previous works on the quantum LQG problem where measurement is performed on the plant and the measurement signals are used as the input to a fully classical controller with no quantum degrees of freedom. The difference in our formulation is the presence of additional non-linear and linear constraints on the coefficients of the sought after controller, rendering the problem as a type of constrained controller design problem. Due to the presence of these constraints, our problem is inherently computationally hard and this also distinguishes it in an important way from the standard LQG problem. We propose a numerical procedure for solving this problem based on an alternating projections algorithm and, as an initial demonstration of the feasibility of this approach, we provide fully quantum controller design examples in which numerical solutions to the problem were successfully obtained. For comparison, we also consider the case of classical linear controllers that use direct or indirect measurements, and show that there exists a fully quantum linear controller which offers an improvement in performance over the classical ones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880
Cited by
Quantum control theory and applications: a survey
Dong, D., & Petersen, I. R. (2010) · IET Control Theory & Applications · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2009.0508 · Cited by 601
Self-citationQuantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Arbitrary quantum control of qubits in the presence of universal noise
Green, T. J., Sastrawan, J., Uys, H., & Biercuk, M. J. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095004 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Nurdin, H. I., James, M. R., & Petersen, I. R.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1837-1846
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152430211
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherent quantum LQG control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.018
- The paper
- Nurdin, H. I., James, M. R., & Petersen, I. R. (2009). Coherent quantum LQG control. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.