Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener models

Open access
Wills, Adrian, Schön, Thomas B., Ljung, Lennart, Ninness, Brett·2013·Automatica

Abstract

This paper develops and illustrates a new maximum-likelihood based method for the identification of Hammerstein-Wiener model structures. A central aspect is that a very general situation is considered wherein multivariable data, non-invertible Hammerstein and Wiener nonlinearities, and colored stochastic disturbances both before and after the Wiener nonlinearity are all catered for. The method developed here addresses the blind Wiener estimation problem as a special case.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.09.018

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Wills, A., Schön, T. B., Ljung, L., & Ninness, B.
Venue
Automatica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
70-81
ISSN
0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009061689
Cited by
295
References
31
FWCI
19.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.09.018
The paper
Wills, A., Schön, T. B., Ljung, L., & Ninness, B. (2013). Identification of Hammerstein–Wiener models. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2012.09.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.