The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Provably safe and robust learning-based model predictive control
Abstract
Controller design faces a trade-off between robustness and performance, and the reliability of linear controllers has caused many practitioners to focus on the former. However, there is renewed interest in improving system performance to deal with growing energy constraints. This paper describes a learning-based model predictive control (LBMPC) scheme that provides deterministic guarantees on robustness, while statistical identification tools are used to identify richer models of the system in order to improve performance; the benefits of this framework are that it handles state and input constraints, optimizes system performance with respect to a cost function, and can be designed to use a wide variety of parametric or nonparametric statistical tools. The main insight of LBMPC is that safety and performance can be decoupled under reasonable conditions in an optimization framework by maintaining two models of the system. The first is an approximate model with bounds on its uncertainty, and the second model is updated by statistical methods. LBMPC improves performance by choosing inputs that minimize a cost subject to the learned dynamics, and it ensures safety and robustness by checking whether these same inputs keep the approximate model stable when it is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, we show that if the system is sufficiently excited, then the LBMPC control action probabilistically converges to that of an MPC computed using the true dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality
Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., & Scokaert, P. O. M. (2000) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/s0005-1098(99)00214-9 · Cited by 8,736
Cited by
All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings
Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Cupeiro Figueroa, I., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Ollé, E. P., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D. L., et al. (2020) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 1,020
Learning-Based Model Predictive Control: Toward Safe Learning in Control
Hewing, L., Wabersich, K. P., Menner, M., & Zeilinger, M. N. (2020) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-090419-075625 · Cited by 835
Data-Driven Model Predictive Control With Stability and Robustness Guarantees
Berberich, J., Kohler, J., Muller, M. A., & Allgower, F. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2020.3000182 · Cited by 803
Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learning
Brunke, L., Greeff, M., Hall, A. W., Yuan, Z., Zhou, S., Panerati, J., & Schoellig, A. P. (2022) · Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1146/annurev-control-042920-020211 · Cited by 769
Aswani, A., Master, N., Taneja, J., Culler, D., & Tomlin, C. (2012) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2011.2161242 · Cited by 289
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aswani, A., Gonzalez, H., Sastry, S. S., & Tomlin, C.
- Venue
- Automatica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1216-1226
- ISSN
- 0005-1098 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006859604
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Provably safe and robust learning-based model predictive control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.02.003
- The paper
- Aswani, A., Gonzalez, H., Sastry, S. S., & Tomlin, C. (2013). Provably safe and robust learning-based model predictive control. Automatica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2013.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.