Prevalence, elicitors, and expression of anger in 21st century mass shootings
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If MS effects using essay primes are only effective in these samples under those conditions, the explanatory power of this method may be more limited than is often presented.
“Although this slice of the population can disproportionately inflict harm when faced with perceived threat [112–115], if MS effects using essay primes are only effective in these samples under those conditions, the explanatory power of this method may be more limited than is often presented.”
From Not so terrifying after all? A set of failed replications of the mortality salience effects of Terror Management Theory (2023) · cites this paper as [112]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Fernandez, E., Callen, A., Johnson, S. L., Gaspar, C., Kulhanek, C., & Jose-Bueno, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- University of the Incarnate Word (US)
- ORCID
- Johnson, Sheri L.
- Venue
- Aggression and Violent Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 55
- Pages
- 101483
- ISSN
- 1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042450761
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Keywords
- mass shootings, anger, anger expression, risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
