Toe pressure in predicting diabetic foot ulcer healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Abstract
Background Foot ulceration is the most frequently recognized lower extremity complication in diabetic patients. Predicting wound healing is an essential step in the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), as it is estimated that early detection and appropriate treatments may prevent up to 85% of amputations. Toe systolic blood pressure (TBP) is a quick and portable bedside assessment and is less affected by medial sclerosis of arteries present in the diabetic population compared to other measurements like ankle-brachial index. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of toe pressure in prediction of DFU wound healing.Methods PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were systematically searched up to September 20, 2017 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All randomized control, prospective and retrospective trials were considered for inclusion if they reported healing rates of DFUs with respect to different TBP readings. Healing was defined to be intact skin for at least 6 months or at time of death. Quality assessment of articles was performed using the RevMan Quality Assessment. Information on healing rates with respect to different TBP values was extracted. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity of TBP in predicting healing of DFU wounds were obtained using a bivariate model.Results A total of 580 articles were screened. Eight studies (6 prospective and 2 retrospective) inclusive of 909 patients were eligible for inclusion. It was found that a TBP of more than 30 mm Hg is associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.86 and 0.58 respectively for healing of DFUs.Conclusions A TBP of more than 30 mm Hg is sensitive but not specific in the prediction of healing of DFUs. Due to its portability and quick analysis, TBP may be used as a bedside assessment to complement current clinical parameters to aid in predicting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Particularly among hospitalized patients, the combination of a positive probe-to-bone test and plain film radiography can be sufficient to diagnose osteomyelitis (likelihood ratio, 14) without the need for other, more expensive radiological studies.
“Particularly among hospitalized patients, for whom the pretest probability of osteomyelitis is high, the combination of a positive probe-to-bone test and plain film radiography can be sufficient to diagnose osteomyelitis (likelihood ratio, 14) without the need for other, more expensive radiological studies.41,42”
From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Tay, W. L., Lo, Z. J., Hong, Q., Yong, E., Chandrasekar, S., & Tan, G. W. L.
- Affiliations
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
- SingHealth (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Lo, Zhiwen Joseph
- Venue
- Annals of Vascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 371-378
- ISSN
- 0890-5096 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2953327467
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Keywords
- diabetic foot ulcer, toe pressure, wound healing prediction, sensitivity and specificity, peripheral arterial disease, amputation prevention
- MeSH terms
- Point-of-Care Testing, Aged, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, Toes, Wound Healing, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Diabetic Foot, Workflow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review