Cited by 237Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyChild and Animal Learning Development

Deconstructing executive deficits among persons with autism: Implications for cognitive neuroscience

Russo, Natalie, Flanagan, Tara, Iarocci, Grace, Berringer, Darlene, Zelazo, Philip David, Burack, Jacob A.·2007·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Individuals with autism demonstrate impairments on measures of executive function (EF) relative to typically developing comparison participants. EF is comprised of several processes including inhibition, working memory and set shifting that develop throughout the lifespan. Impairments in EF may appear early in development and persist, or may represent a more transient delay which resolves with time. Given the unevenness of the cognitive profile of persons with autism, understanding the development of EF poses methodological challenges. These issues include those related to matching measures and the choice of comparison participants to which the performance of persons with autism will be compared. In the current review, we attempt to break down the processes of inhibition, working memory and set shifting among persons with autism. We propose to do this within a developmental perspective that highlights how matching measures and comparison participants can affect the interpretation of research findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Developmental factors need to be taken into account when interpreting cognitive flexibility studies.

    “These findings also indicate that in interpreting cognitive flexibility studies, developmental factors need to be taken into account [11,32].”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Age, cognitive level, and autism subtype heterogeneity does not adequately account for the inconsistent findings.

    “Although one might assume that this also partly explains the inconsistent findings [3,11,32], we believe that these factors do not provide a sufficient explanation for the current findings.”

    From The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism (2009) · cites this paper as [11]

  • Russo et al. review found deficits in verbal working memory in children with ASD compared to TDC.

    “This finding is in line with a review study by Russo et al. [48], finding deficits in verbal working memory in children with ASD compared to TDC.”
  • Despite reports of cognitive flexibility deficits in ASD, particularly in younger children, there are conflicting notions regarding the extent, nature, etiology, and neurobiology of these deficits.

    “Despite reports of cognitive flexibility deficits in ASD (70,71), particularly in younger children (72,73), there are conflicting notions regarding the extent, nature, etiology, and neurobiology of these deficits (74).”
  • Massive heterogeneity among participants with ASD in nonverbal IQ and language abilities necessitates proper characterization of samples and appropriate matching procedures.

    “A third is the massive heterogeneity amongst participants with ASD in terms of nonverbal IQ (NVIQ) and language abilities, necessitating proper characterization of samples and the use of appropriate matching procedures with comparison groups”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 237

Authors
Russo, N., Flanagan, T., Iarocci, G., Berringer, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Burack, J. A.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies (CA)
Corresponding author
Burack, Jacob A.
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
77-86
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131387387
Cited by
237
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, executive function, inhibition, working memory, set-shifting, cognitive development, developmental trajectories
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Human Development, Inhibition, Psychological, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review