Cited by 221Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention

Benefits of physical exercise on executive functions in older people with Parkinson's disease

Tanaka, Kátia, Quadros, Antonio Carlos de, Santos, Ruth Ferreira, Stella, Florindo, Gobbi, Lilian Teresa Bucken, Gobbi, Sebastião·2009·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

The benefits of physical exercise on cognitive functioning have been reported in the literature, but the potential benefits to slow the eventual decline in executive functioning (EF) caused by neurodegeneration from Parkinson's Disease (PD) have rarely been studied. Thus the objective of this study was to analyze the effects of a multimodal physical exercise program on EF in older people with Parkinson's disease. The EF of the older people was evaluated by neuropsychological testing, and for confounding variables such as attention, depressive symptoms and anxiety, before and after intervention. The 20 participants were assigned into Control (CG) and Trained (TG) Groups. The TG participated in generalized physical training for 6 months. The ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p<.05) that indicated a beneficial contribution of training on EF. No significant interactions were found in the results for confounding variables between groups and pre- and post-intervention, which supports the beneficial findings of physical exercise training on EF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 221

Authors
Tanaka, K., Quadros, A. C. D., Santos, R. F., Stella, F., Gobbi, L. T. B., & Gobbi, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Associação Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Tanaka, Kátia
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
435-441
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030012686
Cited by
221
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acervo Digital da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Universidade Estadual Paulista) (submittedVersion)
  • UNESP Institutional Repository (São Paulo State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, physical activity, executive function, older adults, cognitive decline, neurodegeneration, attention, depressive symptoms, anxiety
MeSH terms
Aged, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Attention, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Parkinson Disease, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review