Cardiac modulation of startle: Effects on eye blink and higher cognitive processing
Abstract
Cardiac cycle time has been shown to affect pre-attentive brainstem startle processes, such as the magnitude of acoustically evoked reflexive startle eye blinks. These effects were attributed to baro-afferent feedback mechanisms. However, it remains unclear whether cardiac cycle time plays a role in higher startle-related cognitive processes, as well. Twenty-five volunteers responded first by 'fast as possible' button pushes (reaction time, RT), and second, rated perceived intensity of 60 acoustic startle stimuli (85, 95, or 105 dB; 50 ms duration; binaural; instantaneous rise time), which were presented either 230 or 530 ms after the R-wave, and eye blink responses were measured by EMG. RT was divided into evaluation and motor response time according to previous research. Increasing stimulus intensity enhanced startle eye blink, intensity ratings, and RT components. Eye blinks and intensity judgments were lower when startle was elicited at a latency of R+230 ms, but RT components were differentially affected: the evaluative component was attenuated, and the motor component was accelerated when stimuli were presented 230 ms after the R-wave. We conclude that the cardiac cycle affects the attentive processing of acoustic startle stimuli.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In audition, findings are mixed, with both positive and null findings.
“in audition, findings are mixed, with both positive 60-63 and null findings 64,65 ;”
From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
Koch, M. (1999) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00098-7 · Cited by 1,287 · see citing works
Interoception in emotional experience
Wiens, S. (2005) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/01.wco.0000168079.92106.99 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Heart-beat perception, panic/somatic symptoms and anxiety sensitivity in children
Eley, T. C., Stirling, L., Ehlers, A., Gregory, A. M., & Clark, D. M. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00152-9 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interoceptive rhythms in the brain
Engelen, T., Solcà, M., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01425-1 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Schulz, A., Lass-Hennemann, J., Sütterlin, S., Schächinger, H., & Vögele, C. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.01.007 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationActive information sampling varies across the cardiac cycle
Kunzendorf, S., Klotzsche, F., Akbal, M., Villringer, A., Ohl, S., & Gaebler, M. (2019) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13322 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Schulz, A., Schilling, T. M., Vögele, C., Larra, M. F., & Schächinger, H. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0019 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationSchulz, A., Matthey, J. H., Vögele, C., Schaan, V., Schächinger, H., Adler, J., Beutel, M. E., & Michal, M. (2016) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2016.03.051 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Schulz, A., Reichert, C. F., Richter, S., Lass-Hennemann, J., Blumenthal, T. D., & Schächinger, H.
- Affiliations
- Universität Trier (DE)
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schulz, André
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-271
- ISSN
- 0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010746815
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Keywords
- cardiac cycle, startle response, blinking, acoustic startle response, baroreflex, reaction time, stimulus intensity, evaluative processing, motor response, R wave, attention, cognitive processes
- MeSH terms
- Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Auditory Perception, Blinking, Electrocardiography, Electromyography, Female, Heart, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reflex, Startle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review