Working memory training: Improving intelligence – Changing brain activity
Abstract
The main objectives of the study were: to investigate whether training on working memory (WM) could improve fluid intelligence, and to investigate the effects WM training had on neuroelectric (electroencephalography - EEG) and hemodynamic (near-infrared spectroscopy - NIRS) patterns of brain activity. In a parallel group experimental design, respondents of the working memory group after 30 h of training significantly increased performance on all tests of fluid intelligence. By contrast, respondents of the active control group (participating in a 30-h communication training course) showed no improvements in performance. The influence of WM training on patterns of neuroelectric brain activity was most pronounced in the theta and alpha bands. Theta and lower-1 alpha band synchronization was accompanied by increased lower-2 and upper alpha desynchronization. The hemodynamic patterns of brain activity after the training changed from higher right hemispheric activation to a balanced activity of both frontal areas. The neuroelectric as well as hemodynamic patterns of brain activity suggest that the training influenced WM maintenance functions as well as processes directed by the central executive. The changes in upper alpha band desynchronization could further indicate that processes related to long term memory were also influenced.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EEG power in the alpha frequency band over the posterior parietal cortex inversely correlates with mental workload.
“Moreover, published literature stressed the inverse correlation between the EEG power in the alpha frequency band over the PPC and the mental workload62,63.”
From The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload and presence (2021) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Jaušovec, N., & Jaušovec, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Maribor (SI)
- Corresponding author
- Jaušovec, Norbert
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-106
- ISSN
- 0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053978518
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 20.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- working memory training, fluid intelligence, neuroplasticity, EEG alpha band, alpha desynchronization, hemispheric activation, frontal lobe, central executive, long-term memory, cognitive training
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Cortical Synchronization, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Practice, Psychological, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review