Cited by 46Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Breath-focused mindfulness alters early and late components during emotion regulation

Open access
Zhang, Wenhai, Ouyang, Yongqiang, Tang, Fanggui, Chen, Jie, Li, Hong·2019·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Breath-focused mindfulness (BFM), which induces changes in brain structure and function, is applied in the clinical treatment of mental disorders as a method to regulate one's emotions. However, whether BFM works through a top-down emotional regulation strategy to alter brain dynamics and its relationship with individual differences in trait mindfulness are unclear. Event-related potentials (ERPs) of 20 healthy BFM-naïve undergraduates were recorded when they conducted BFM/viewing tasks while viewing affective pictures. Participants completed the Attentional Control Scale (ACS) and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). The results indicated that under the viewing condition, positive and negative pictures elicited greater P1, N2, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes than did neutral pictures. However, BFM attenuated P1, N2, and LPP amplitudes for positive and negative pictures but not for neutral pictures. P1 amplitudes for emotional minus neutral pictures correlated with individual differences in focus attention measured by the ACS, while N2 amplitudes for emotional minus neutral pictures correlated with individual differences in trait mindfulness measured by the MAAS. These observations suggest that, consistent with the dual-process model, BFM is an effective emotion regulation strategy and might activate the dorsal top-down prefrontal system to alter early and late neural dynamics of affective processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103585

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 79 · Cited by 46

Authors
Zhang, W., Ouyang, Y., Tang, F., Chen, J., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Hengyang Normal University (CN)
  • China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tang, Fanggui
  • Li, Hong
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
135
Pages
103585
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964566950
Cited by
46
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Shenzhen University
  • Hengyang Normal University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
emotion regulation, top-down control, trait mindfulness, P1 component, N2 component, late positive potential, individual differences, attentional control, dual-process models, dorsal prefrontal cortex, event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Attention, Awareness, Brain, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Respiration, Students, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review