Breath-focused mindfulness alters early and late components during emotion regulation
Open accessAbstract
Breath-focused mindfulness (BFM), which induces changes in brain structure and function, is applied in the clinical treatment of mental disorders as a method to regulate one's emotions. However, whether BFM works through a top-down emotional regulation strategy to alter brain dynamics and its relationship with individual differences in trait mindfulness are unclear. Event-related potentials (ERPs) of 20 healthy BFM-naïve undergraduates were recorded when they conducted BFM/viewing tasks while viewing affective pictures. Participants completed the Attentional Control Scale (ACS) and the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS). The results indicated that under the viewing condition, positive and negative pictures elicited greater P1, N2, and late positive potential (LPP) amplitudes than did neutral pictures. However, BFM attenuated P1, N2, and LPP amplitudes for positive and negative pictures but not for neutral pictures. P1 amplitudes for emotional minus neutral pictures correlated with individual differences in focus attention measured by the ACS, while N2 amplitudes for emotional minus neutral pictures correlated with individual differences in trait mindfulness measured by the MAAS. These observations suggest that, consistent with the dual-process model, BFM is an effective emotion regulation strategy and might activate the dorsal top-down prefrontal system to alter early and late neural dynamics of affective processing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research suggests that "Breath Focus Mindfulness practices" is an effective emotional regulation strategy.
“Research suggests that “Breath Focus Mindfulness practices” is an effective emotional regulation strategy (Zhang et al., 2019).”
From Being able to think when caught in the maelstrom - how adolescents used mindfulness when facing exams. (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 79 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Ouyang, Y., Tang, F., Chen, J., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- Hengyang Normal University (CN)
- China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Shenzhen University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Tang, Fanggui
- Li, Hong
- Venue
- Brain and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 103585
- ISSN
- 0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964566950
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ir.psych.ac.cn
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Shenzhen University
- Hengyang Normal University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Keywords
- emotion regulation, top-down control, trait mindfulness, P1 component, N2 component, late positive potential, individual differences, attentional control, dual-process models, dorsal prefrontal cortex, event-related potentials
- MeSH terms
- Emotional Regulation, Adolescent, Attention, Awareness, Brain, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Respiration, Students, Young Adult, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review