Cited by 79Liver physiology and pathologyComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Anatomy of rodent and human livers: What are the differences?

Open access
Kruepunga, Nutmethee, Hakvoort, Theodorus B.M., Hikspoors, Jill P.J.M., Köhler, S. Eleonore, Lamers, Wouter H.·2019·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease

Abstract

The size of the liver of terrestrial mammals obeys the allometric scaling law over a weight range of >3 ∗ 10 6. Since scaling reflects adaptive changes in size or scale among otherwise similar animals, we can expect to observe more similarities than differences between rodent and human livers. Obvious differences, such as the presence (rodents) or absence (humans) of lobation and the presence (mice, humans) or absence (rats) of a gallbladder, suggest qualitative differences between the livers of these species. After review, however, we conclude that these dissimilarities represent relatively small quantitative differences. The microarchitecture of the liver is very similar among mammalian species and best represented by the lobular concept, with the biggest difference present in the degree of connective tissue development in the portal tracts. Although larger mammals have larger lobules, increasing size of the liver is mainly accomplished by increasing the number of lobules. The increasing role of the hepatic artery in lobular perfusion of larger species is, perhaps, the most important and least known difference between small and large livers, because it profoundly affects not only interventions like liver transplantations, but also calculations of liver function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.05.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When considering the anatomy of mouse and human livers, while the external appearance differs, the microscopic lobular architecture is well conserved.

    “When considering the anatomy of mouse and human livers, while the external appearance differs the microscopic lobular architecture is well conserved(51).”
  • Neutrophil depletion alleviates LPS-induced systemic inflammation and liver damage in ASH.

    “Neutrophil depletion alleviates LPS-induced systemic inflammation and liver damage in ASH (51).”

    From The liver as a central "hub" of the immune system: pathophysiological implications (2025) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Species section discusses liver architecture and changes during ethanol perfusion, while the closest References passages concern hepatic blood flow and endotoxin neutralization; no page numbers are available in our copy. Searches for neutrophil depletion, LPS-induced inflammation, and alcoholic steatohepatitis found no passage addressing whether depletion alleviates inflammation or liver damage. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. K. Schmidt-Nielsen, Scaling: Why is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984.
  2. H.E. Evans, The digestive apparatus and abdomen, in: H.E. Evans (Ed.), Miller's Anatomy of the Dog, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1993, pp. 385-462.
  3. ICVGAN, Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria, 6th Revised Edition Ed. 2017.
  4. FCA, International Anatomical Terminology, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1998.
  5. F.T. Lewis, The development of the liver, in: F. Keibel, F.P. Mall (Eds.), Manual of Human Embryology, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1912, pp. 403-428.
  6. J. Shindoh, M. Akahane, S. Satou, T. Aoki, Y. Beck, K. Hasegawa, Y. Sugawara, K. Ohtomo, N. Kokudo, Vascular architecture in anomalous right-sided liga- mentum teres: three-dimensional analyses in 35 patients, HPB (Oxford) 14 (2012) 32-41.
  7. O. Yener, M.Z. Buldanli, H. Eksioglu, M. Leblebici, O. Alimoglu, Agenesis of the gallbladder diagnosed by magnetic resonance cholangiography: report of a case and review of the literature, Prague Med. Rep. 116 (2015) 52-56.
  8. F. Kiernan, The anatomy and physiology of the liver, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 123 (1833) 711-770.
  9. B. Quistorff, B. Chance, Redox scanning in the study of metabolic zonation of liver, in: R.G. Thurman, F.C. Kauffman, K. Jungermann (Eds.), Regulation of Hepatic Metabolism. Intra-and Intercellular Compartmentation, Plenum Press, New York, 1986, pp. 185-209.
  10. H. Braus, Eingeweide, Anatomie des Menschen. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte, Springer, Berlin, 1924, p. 317 Figure 162.
  11. C.J. Epstein, Cell size, nuclear content, and the development of polyploidy in the mammalian liver, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 57 (1967) 327-334.
  12. S. Todo, L. Makowka, A.G. Tzakis, J.W. Marsh Jr., F.M. Karrer, M. Armany, C. Miller, M.B. Tallent, C.O. Esquivel, R.D. Gordon, et al., Hepatic artery in liver transplantation, Transplant. Proc. 19 (1987) 2406-2411.
  13. A. Kashfi, A. Mehrabi, P.S. Pahlavan, P. Schemmer, C.N. Gutt, H. Friess, M.M. Gebhard, J. Schmidt, M.W. Buchler, T.W. Kraus, A review of various tech- niques of orthotopic liver transplantation in the rat, Transplant. Proc. 37 (2005) 185-188.
  14. F.G. Stan, C. Matonos, C. Dezdrobitu, A. Damian, A. Gudea, Detailed morpholo- gical description of the liver and hepatic ligaments in the guinea pig (Cavia por- cellus), Scientific Works, Series C (veterinary medicine), 13 2014, pp. 35-41.
  15. K.-D. Budras, W.O. Sack, S. Rock, Abdominal wall and cavity, Anatomy of the Horse: An Illustrated Text, Schlütersche, Hannover, 2003, pp. 58-65.
  16. B. Cozzi, S. Huggenberger, H.A. Öllschläger, Feeding and the digestive system, Anatomy of Dolphins. Insights Into Body Structure and Function, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017, pp. 339-368.
  17. S.W. Tinker, The digestive system, Whales of the World, Brill, Leiden, 1988, pp. 57-64.
  18. B. Cozzi, H.A. Huggenberger, H.S. Ölschläger, Feeding and the digestive system, in: B. Cozzi, H.A. Huggenberger, H.S. Ölschläger (Eds.), Anatomy of Dolphins. Insights into Body Structure and Function, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017, pp. 339-368.
  19. C. Xie, W. Wei, T. Zhang, O. Dirsch, U. Dahmen, Monitoring of systemic and he- patic hemodynamic parameters in mice, J. Vis. Exp. 92 (2014) e51955, , http://dx. doi.org/10.3791/51955. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kruepunga, N., Hakvoort, T. B. M., Hikspoors, J. P. J. M., Köhler, S. E., & Lamers, W. H.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
Corresponding author
Lamers, Wouter H.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
1865
Issue
5
Pages
869-878
ISSN
0925-4439 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804361720
Cited by
79
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
liver anatomy, rodent liver, human liver, comparative anatomy, liver lobule, portal tract, hepatic artery, liver transplantation, gallbladder
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Gallbladder, Humans, Liver, Rodentia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review