Cited by 71Cellular transport and secretionIon Transport and Channel RegulationExtracellular vesicles in disease

Apocrine secretion: New insights into an old phenomenon

Farkaš, Robert·2015·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects

Abstract

Background While apocrine secretion was among the earliest secretory mechanisms to be identified, its underlying basis remains poorly understood. Scope of review This review reappraises our understanding of apocrine secretion using insights about apocrine secretion from the salivary glands of Drosophila, in which molecular genetic analyses have provided a glimmer of hope for elucidating the mechanistic aspects of this fundamental process. Major conclusions In contrast to the well-defined process of exocytosis, apocrine secretion is non-vesicular transport and secretory pathway that entails the loss of part of the cytoplasm. It often involves apical protrusions and generates cytoplasmic fragments inside a secretory lumen. In its most intense phase this process is accompanied by the release of large fragments of cellular structures and entire organelles that include mitochondria, Golgi, and portions of the endoplasmic reticulum, among others. Proteomic analyses revealed that the secretion is composed of hundreds to thousands of membranous, cytoskeletal, microsomal, mitochondrial, ribosomal, and even nuclear as well as nucleolar proteins. Strikingly, although many nuclear proteins are released, the nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid itself remains intact. In spite of this complexity, it appears that several protein components of apocrine secretion are identical, regardless of the location of the apocrine gland. General significance This type of secretion appears to be common to many,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.05.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 154 · Cited by 71

Authors
Farkaš, R.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
1850
Issue
9
Pages
1740-1750
ISSN
0304-4165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W270891856
Cited by
71
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • VEGA (2/0170/10, 2/0109/13)
  • NATO (CRG-972173, LST.CLG-977559)
  • EEA-Norwegian FM (SK-0086)
  • R.F.
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
apocrine secretion, Drosophila salivary gland, secreted proteins, nuclear proteins, polarized epithelium, secretory pathway
MeSH terms
Animals, Apocrine Glands, Biotechnology, Exocytosis, Humans, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review