Apocrine secretion: New insights into an old phenomenon
Abstract
Background While apocrine secretion was among the earliest secretory mechanisms to be identified, its underlying basis remains poorly understood. Scope of review This review reappraises our understanding of apocrine secretion using insights about apocrine secretion from the salivary glands of Drosophila, in which molecular genetic analyses have provided a glimmer of hope for elucidating the mechanistic aspects of this fundamental process. Major conclusions In contrast to the well-defined process of exocytosis, apocrine secretion is non-vesicular transport and secretory pathway that entails the loss of part of the cytoplasm. It often involves apical protrusions and generates cytoplasmic fragments inside a secretory lumen. In its most intense phase this process is accompanied by the release of large fragments of cellular structures and entire organelles that include mitochondria, Golgi, and portions of the endoplasmic reticulum, among others. Proteomic analyses revealed that the secretion is composed of hundreds to thousands of membranous, cytoskeletal, microsomal, mitochondrial, ribosomal, and even nuclear as well as nucleolar proteins. Strikingly, although many nuclear proteins are released, the nuclear deoxyribonucleic acid itself remains intact. In spite of this complexity, it appears that several protein components of apocrine secretion are identical, regardless of the location of the apocrine gland. General significance This type of secretion appears to be common to many,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Apocrine glands are considered adrenergic and secrete proteins.
“They are considered adrenergic and secrete proteins41.”
From Morphological characteristics and notes of the skin in preclinical toxicity assessment (2023) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 154 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- Farkaš, R.
- Venue
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 1850
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1740-1750
- ISSN
- 0304-4165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W270891856
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 154
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 0.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- VEGA (2/0170/10, 2/0109/13)
- NATO (CRG-972173, LST.CLG-977559)
- EEA-Norwegian FM (SK-0086)
- R.F.
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Keywords
- apocrine secretion, Drosophila salivary gland, secreted proteins, nuclear proteins, polarized epithelium, secretory pathway
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Apocrine Glands, Biotechnology, Exocytosis, Humans, Proteomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review